Argument map demo

Because Flat Earthers are wrong84% Argument: Flat Earthers are wrong 84% trueVote Rate your belief Strongly Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly How certain are you of this belief? Highly Doubtful Medium Certain Highly Give rating
if 1: 61%flat Earthers believe earth is flat and 2: 73%earth is not flat then 3: 91%Flat Earthers are incorrect 1: flat Earthers believe earth is flat 61% trueVote Rate your belief Strongly Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly How certain are you of this belief? Highly Doubtful Medium Certain Highly
1.1: understandable from the name 1.2: stated in Wiktionary: “A person who believes or advocates the theory that the planet Earth is flat.” ReferenceHideWiktionary [Flat Earther] 1.3: stated in Wikipedia: “The flat Earth model is an archaic conception of Earth’s shape as a plane or disk.” 2: earth is not flat 2.1: See same sunset from different heights 2.2: Boats disappear/appear in horizon with height-differences 2.3: On a flat surfance on a really clear day, we still can’t see very far 3: Flat Earthers are incorrect 3.1: If a premise is invalid, the premise-holder is incorrect. 3.2: Flat Earthers belive in the premise 1.1. 3.3: Because they belive in the premise, and the promise is invalid, they are incorrect. 1.1: understandable from the name 1.1.1: A name doesn’t necessarily imply belief (logical fallacy (disprove entire argument)) 1.1.2: According to Argument Conspiracy theory names the name are often directly linked to the belief people should be informed of it.

Earth is not flat therefore if 1: flat Earthers believe earth is flat and 2: earth is not flat then 3: Flat Earthers are incorrect 1: flat Earthers believe earth is flat 1.1: understandable from the name 1.2: stated in Wiktionary: “A person who believes or advocates the theory that the planet Earth is flat.” ReferenceHideWiktionary [Flat Earther] 1.3: stated in Wikipedia: “The flat Earth model is an archaic conception of Earth’s shape as a plane or disk.” 2: earth is not flat 2.1: See same sunset from different heights 2.2: Boats disappear/appear in horizon with height-differences 2.3: On a flat surfance on a really clear day, we still can’t see very far 3: Flat Earthers are incorrect 3.1: If a premise is invalid, the premise-holder is incorrect. 3.2: Flat Earthers belive in the premise 1.1. 3.3: Because they belive in the premise, and the promise is invalid, they are incorrect. 1.1: understandable from the name 1.1.1: A name doesn’t necessarily imply belief (logical fallacy (disprove entire argument)) 1.1.2: According to Argument Conspiracy theory names the name are often directly linked to the belief Flat Earthers’ are incorrect.

Our belief that Argument maps will be net positive84% Argument maps will be net positive 84% trueVote Rate your belief Strongly Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly How certain are you of this belief? Highly Doubtful Medium Certain Highly Give rating
if 1: 61%Net Positive is and 2:73%the score is 51%+ then 3: 91%Arguments-maps are net positive 1: Definition of net positive 61% trueVote Rate your belief Strongly Disagree Unsure Agree Strongly How certain are you of this belief? Highly Doubtful Medium Certain Highly How impactful is this to the the above claim? No impact Irrelevant Unsure Relevant Crucial
1.1: The desirable outcomes of time in Universe 1.2: Where Arg 1.1 outcomes are defined by human beings 1.3: Limited to an initial amount of factors listed in Initial Factors 2: The score is 50%+ Explanation: A simple majority is motivated enough to create the software 2.1: Given that positive forces and negative forces are accounting for all positivty and negativity (including ex. risks,alternative costs, rare events) then a simply majority is enough 2.3: Assumes positive development is better than negative development 3: Arguments maps are net positive 3.1: If it meets definitions per 1.1 and score per 1.2, the premise is valid 3.2: If premise is valid, then Argument Maps are net positive 1.1: The desirable outcomes of time in Universe 1.1.1: Well-being for humanity 70% of 100 Vote How impactful is this to the Parent claim? No impact Irrelevant Unsure Relevant Crucial 1.1.2: Well-being for sentient beings 15% of 100 Vote How impactful is this to the Parent claim? No impact Irrelevant Unsure Relevant Crucial 1.1.3: Increased intelligence 7.5% of 100 Vote How impactful is this to the Parent claim? No impact Irrelevant Unsure Relevant Crucial 1.1.4: Increased consciousness 7.5% of 100 Vote How impactful is this to the Parent claim? No impact Irrelevant Unsure Relevant Crucial 1.1.1: Well-being for humanity 1.1.1.1: Increased probabibility of specie survival70% 1.1.1.2: Perception of contentment15% 1.1.1.3: Improve material conditions7.5% 1.1.1.4: Perception of meaning15% is why we develop them