Impact Disclaimer: Please keep in mind I been doing this work to create a better world for humans, without any compensation. For the project you decide to work on, please consider the impact it has on the well-being of humans and other sentient beings, whether short-term or long-term. Please don’t support totalitarian regimes or exploitive capitalism (ex. addictive internet products) but please support impactful-capitalism (using capital to speed up development of uplifting technology) and others products you believe help mankind. Now, for the documents themselves:
General notes & Requirement specifications (Updated 2019-12-13)
Lots of scattered ideas, here is all the behind-the-scenes of my work of argument maps. If you read it you might find something useful.It’s based on { } with lots of line-breaks, so I would suggest copying this text to a code editor, ex. Visual Studio.
low-prio responsive design of boxes Informing.org Show all button logics { If summary+hints then { hide closer for level1 (circle) + level2 (text-hint) on hover level 2, show level 3 } If only summary, then { show level1 { when hover, show level 2 and level 3 when checked, show a closer “-” } hide level 2 { show when level1 get checked } } If everything { Show level 2 and level 3. Hide level 1 closer. Show closer for level 2, when hover an open-paranthesis } Input all { Should only be possible to check 1 at a time. How? Maybe a script that says if that one is checked, uncheck others. Same as currently running { How can new design be made? Keep design, just uncheck another } } Classes { summary_hints {default. hide level1_trig, show level 2 + set summary_hints, everything to no. } only_summary {hide level2, show level1_trig + set summary_hints, everything to no. } everything {hide level1_trig, show level 2, level 3, level 4, level 5 etc + set summary_hints, everything to no. } } } Document Structure { One document to rule them all? Content { Brainstorming Structured Requirement specification ToDo items { easy list, can be tagged with commas. hard to sync to calendar so have to read through all things. maybe easier using todoist? } } } netlify { hosting free } check out OmniFocus and switch from Todoist google – export todoist to omnifocus google – omnifocus iphone OmniFocus note { onboarding { rather than a “guide how-to”, when first interacting with app, show why things are happening (an itneractive tooltip as soon as user-interaction happens) } cons { todoist got 3 priorities. omnifocus got 1. should have unlimited. } general comment { missing feature { x-y graph of importance/urgency (omnifocus only got 1 flag, although got tags/projects that are usable) } } } Robert + Erik brainstorm { niche for MVP { idea: meeting notes { ex. feature mvp: meeting notes, sync ToDo to other “todo-app of choice” ex. target audience people who use lots of voice and text } idea: brainstorming session with ToDo:s involved { automatic context-view of a ToDo } idea target audience: product managers + project managers integrated { few good Product-Management tools available. none that sync with project management } idea low probability: code-commenting software? get git code and review { ex. feature: code-expanded from comments. clickable links } general use case: helps people keep in creative writing-flow as able to specify anything as ToDo, ToGoogle, OpenQuestions, ResearchTopic etc and all those items come up as ToDo. } feedback: descriptive task-names solves most context-USP maybe: mvp is difficult to find users. when have many features, will be 10x all other CMS-related applications (todo apps/task managers, word-processors, project managers etc) } long-term version idea { self-record video and have video-transcribe. so can ex. create todo from video. see the video-snippet from where the idea came from (10s). } ToDo drafts today { reference another todo { before !go for grocery shopping! #google best washing powder } ? reference another Note-item, ex. a paragraph or text-selection. quote.. } Req spec definitions { mvp will need to use @!#? etc but in future versions will be a parser that understands input, ex. “tomorrow”, “before” and if matching any of all the added ToDo items } : Look into QUIP. Only other is OneNote. Huge opportunity on notes+todo combined. Paragraph in multiple documents { Says “this paragraph is used by several views, if edit it will edit globally. Make fork to create local version IF embed, not multiple? maybe embedded content have a background (blue/gray) with a View-icon (angled <> like fullscreen icon) in top-right. look at forking-structure of github. } – todo Expandable content should have “expand-all” buttons to be really useful, in the beginning the user make choices ex. show all definitions / show easy to read first and hard to read in paranthesis, or opposite Use case Expandable is ex. transcribed audio-recordings, podcast-notes, long papers. just show the main quotes. desireable to also have comment/(multi-)quote summaries Edit2: if main quotes, expand-button should show the original quote both before and after, with only one button click. the orginial become bold and stay in its original position, while text show up before and after. q: how should button for expand both before and after look? idea: in sidebar button with tiny border floating left with ; “Expand “icon arrow up, down””? Use case Expandable: Meetings, first set an Agenda – then takes notes under it. Desireable two tags as children h2: conclusion and h2: related notes. Q: how different than dynalist? maybe that elements become reusable? however, dynalist have great global-search filtering aswell.. q: how should re-usable content function? Ability to choose which to be default and which to be in paranthesis between easy-read and technical first (difficulty-reverse function) Use case: social blogging 2.0 { be able to share notes via wordpress in a cool format (inline, or easily tag access-levels on a paragraph). this is a really good use case for mvp as well. plus gives impact easily. } Maybe use case early { like todo, but a schedule of social media posts – with the image and the caption – and a schedule to copy & paste – or maybe open in desktop and post. especially if linkedin/twitter/fb, can post via desktop and insta maybe also. first just copy & paste, later also a browser plugin for (semi-)automate } Decision, Certainty5: if no documentname use the first h1. design like wordpress, ability to click above – but by default just write the first h1. OrigQ: need to have documentName, since just h1 wont work – can be multiple h1s. Use case: tab {} () all mean children. ?Converted to >? a: for mass-users do (), however its slightly grammatically wrong. what will use-case be when the () actually just mean paranthesis? should it support both () and {} ? Decision Feature: Like todoist if something is looking to be labeled, ex. “tomorrow”, but user click on it and do Backspace, then remove the tag. same if ?typing a question? and backspace, just type it unformated Idea Feature: Headers dont matter when got child/Parent and { indent or linebreak} Such important feature: Level expand. Ex. “Close all except level 1” DesignThink: Desirable that a header can be linked to another one. { Ex. the header “Relations between items, Titles, Paragraphs” to be linked to titles “context search” and “Maps UX” Could be in sidebar, show arrow(s) to related headers and those headers in small font. have button for expand the viewport of the graph-view, or maybe expand it on hovering that part of sidebar Design: Graph-view 100% height, 50% width. Detail-markdown view 100% height, 50% width. Draggable 20/20% width/height for one and 80/80% for other (ex. top right/bottom right pane with graph/text-view) } DesignThink: related to above: How relations between paragraphs beyond parent/child? ex. a custom defined relation. { Related: Link between notes When typing ex. !ref a drop-down search shows up with all existing Entries. User can click one and a link is created, shown as the name of that Entry. The URL path is the document-path ex (wn4kegjn-34mnri5) of that entry so if EntryName change link remain, however the URL name is the EntryName. } Desirable feature: Content-templates (ex. habit logs, journals, meeting-notes) { UX: Button “+” for create, and button “+X” for create with pre-filled template (inspiration: Word/Google docs create from template) Content in journaling, both text-based and ranges/questions/checkbox Ex. How many gram meat did you eat today? What was the key moments of today? Did you meditate 10 minutes? Idea for later: Also possible via voice. The app reads the question and user answers via voice. If the app has low certainty in text-respond, the app ask again, or verifies the answer with the user. Ex. Habit tracking { Had an 8-scale urge to eat junk-food, after having a argue with my boss Template Had an X #urge to #eat junk-food, #after having Comment: MVP can have require-to-follow-template exactly, while future versions got a better parser and NLP. } Can also leave things empty in the habit-tracking template. } Mini-Feature Ux: On the ToDo today, in the bottom have a button “show this week” and button above “past due” DesignThink: Merged labels / Sub-labels { Think: how to make strength/certainty/doubt in labels? just 1-10? or other thing than labels.. ToDo labels can be urgency/importance. MergeView should be able to easily sort or have visualization (ex. If 2 parameters, show in 4 boards -XY, XY, X-Y, -X-Y). This solves lots of prioritization, however only on 2 metrics. 3 metrics can be in a 3d-graph. more than that would be harder.. maybe google: 4d graph. also google 3d graph. “4 axis” } Likely technically-difficult feature: Outline interactivity: { Would be nice to be able to change HeaderType (h1-h6) via Outline/ToC, by ex. Pressing Tab or Tab+backward, and it becomes one level less/more, and all Children update too. Also nice to drag & drop in Outline and the content of that header changes in the document. (When drag & drop in Outliner, the content re-structures) Outliner hide/show also affect document In a long document, should be able to hide, show content based on which titles you want to have open, like Zoho Navigation Bar. If hide things there, they get hidden from documents too (only document with a tab-down button in shown) } Example content tagged: Requirement spec features { #stack or #risk or #estimation and #use-case #user-group or #demand or #uniqueness or #version } ToDo Design Decision 1) Idea: table (multiColumn) 2) Todoist (1column) with tags below and “show more of context” { ToDo ; Tags (Filter) ; Context [ ] Write Memo ; Meeting 2019-02-24, @Erik ; Action points we dec… > } {Concept maps { help to answer { focus question(s) which { are Context dependent. e.g. { social personal } } } and.. represent { Organized Knowledge { which is needed to answer { Focus question(s) } which is { context dependent } which is necessary for { effective teaching effective learning } is comprised of { propositions { which are Units of meaning { constructed in Cognitive Structure } } Concepts { connected using Linking Words { used to form Propositions } } } } } }} Conclusion: Concept Maps can’t be written in text like this – they need be displayed in their full scope. Maybe ToDo feature: alert about a note { Ex. Alert me of this note at 2019-XX-XX 10:37. Send a notification with ring-tone at that time. } Maybe ToDo feature: Time-tracking when starting to work on a ToDo, how long it take { Sync with time-tracking app of the whole operating system where time is spent. Offer automatic Journaling template filled with amount of the items where time been spent } Question: load content via command, could be via new pane search-result? { ex. writing and want to open window-pane and load all content #note-app, #version>alpha, #feature>sync. } Maybe conditional on/off save editing history { new paragraphs can be saved with hashtag #edit-{date} if just a small change, doesnt need to be saved. perhaps user can check/uncheck a box, or hold a key (ex. ctrl) to make paragraph/large edits not-save UX like Zoho save edit/not? } Life plan: Maybe forget about the whole CMS / SEP thing and focus directly on Argument Graph. This is the big invention, the long-term plan and the secret sauce. Argument map solutions { Features { Related statements to a question (Ex1) Argument-relativity { All things considered { Feature: Unconsider an Argument { Feature: most unconsidered (ex2) { (Ex2) Unconsider “God created Earth (Undefined: 0.2% likelihood)” } } } All related arguments are weighted on metrics, ex. relevance/importance } Defining arguments (Ex3) } Metrics { strength relevance easiness (easy-to-read) { from swarmproject.info { Reasoning { completeness correctness logic evidence alternatives } Communication { clarity format } }} } Example { (Ex1) Is sugar more dangerous than aspartam? { Related: sugar is more dangerous than aspartam {All things considered, 73%} Related: aspartam is more dangerous than sugar {All things considered, 27%} (Ex3) sugar is more dangerous than aspartam given study X (Total 82%, increase 10%) } } Design decision: { How far down to with argumenting vs intuitiong-rating { Comment: in the very end, intuition sets the metrics that is inherited upwards Comment: emotional arguments without reasoning like “it doesnt make sense” (and no comment why) should (probably) be intuition-ratings } Debate mapping { Referencable PersonX-PersonY debate { debate-winner or content can be referencable later “when X,Y debate this they came to {conclusion}” } can be summarized to main arguments { Either by participants, or later by QuoteMap-contributors } } Loose ends { References in debate (Knowledge-clusters, studies etc.) or logical reasoning systems used. Loose-ends in debate can be filled up with arguments from others. Conclusion can differ and original debaters can be notified. {Growth: notify via 3rd party social media, ex. tweet reference} } Re-usable arguments / Canonical { Each argument is based on sub-arguments, except for the lowest intuition-only (maybe there’s no intuition-only, as probabilities can be done argument circuling {ex. atoms pattern proven by theories, most forms of god existing unlikely given belief-formation theories}) } } } Items from CMS desirable for AG { Multi-pane in one app. { Ex open sub-arguments, examples etc in other pane } } Expandable Levels: Two + two modes { First-load display / require user interaction = same as = Display all text / Expandable texts (Display level 1 only) { Hover to see more. Click, show as box” or similar to make a 1) fixed scrollable sidebar/2) relative-positioned widget } Design { Buttons for text-interaction { Buttons within text or around it, for customizing – ex show all level 1/2/3. Or show tags X Y Z, author X Y Z, edit time X Y Z etc. Design could be ex “Checkbox: Show only level 1 (icon arrow down)” and icon arrow down got other levels } Scroll-box color-match from level 1 { CSS: if input(not:checked) then have no border-bottom. otherwise have colored border of the expanable and have text-color of same in the scroll-box. } When all content shown, show when hovering The light (unfocused content) should also have a button ex “highlight icon”. ex. marker/highlight fontawesome icons When only level 1 shown { buttons for expanding hover words to see level 2+3 { click to “show in seperate pane” (map icon) (or seperate window) (split-view) } buttons for “show level 2/3” { when shown 2/3, also have {} or “- sign” or +sign } Q: Should level 2/3 be shown in a sticky side-window and when hover a word, show it in the sidebar + have the highlight window? Too much? Only highlight window? } } } When hover word, show related text in sidebar. make bg color on the word. maybe: arrow to the box. over? angled? z-index under the text in same paragraph, but above others.. what about long paragraphs?maybe just up two lines and will be fine, dotted too. css is fine because arrow dtyle always gnab e same. make draft in PS first. design like google docs comments that require click. panes, leveled panes { also do design of panes. ex. a top-left pane. a left 100% height pane. a 100% width top-pane pane-in-pane layered design. ex. a main pane of parent and a sub-pane to the left sidebar with the child content. inside that can have another child3, in bottom maybe, leveled panes dont make sense since different words will have different desire of levled-reading by users and reading from different panes is tedious. rather it should be next to eachother, ex. expandable within the same text. maybe just design of inline-text of different levels is the biggest challenge but the best solution too. } q: hover? q: buttons? q: show all initially? q: design when show all? curly brackets, border-bottom, bg color, line break? how to read the high-level only? aah. maybe have the “all shown” in default and the high-level-1 shown in a small-pane ex. right sidebar, or a section-sticky bottom-pane, that user scroll past when next section. thats a really good one. “fixed height” when in certain section of page, or px height of page.. or in that case could just be a sidebar? lets start wthi the sidebar. and nice design on both the level1only and the all-shown. button for “read level 1 only” which make gray overlay on left show-all and make box-shadow and highlight the right-sidebar with only level 1. ex. CTA “read summary only” q: design when not show all? plus buttons etc. Balance hover/click Hover should be default. However for mobile, hover will just be temporary, so better with expand, unless temporary is more desirable.. responsive design look at the swedish governemnt website that had definition, got screenshot fairly recent in Photos, has popup on hover/click mobile Should have a “Read all” button that take all the hoverables into expanded text. Definetely easily possible via CSS. Just if input, make position relative rather than absolute. From the Hoverable shoud be possible to expand more. If so, open it up in the current text-section, maybe new-line. Roadmap { Publish all my thoughts as JSON on informing.org { In Open-Source outline the philosophy in expandable text and below it have all documents shown. { Philosophy { avoid tech giants and authoritarian regimes } } } Solution Make design for Blog 2.0 Deliverable to public > Feedback, Scalability. Also deliverable to do better decision-making based on journaling – is this true? If so is a good invention. Publish Req spec, or blog posts in the new format { can also be general (technological, geopolitical, technopolitical etc) blog posts } Deliverable: Make decision on first MVP to build { Blogging for myself is very first Could sell the blogging design. Could just forget about money for a while tbh. Could be a CMS. But going towards truth is what we really want. So social blogging based on comments, arguments is much more interesting. Like ChangeAView, Trustory but a grander one. } Deliverable: Write article about argument-map possibility, landscape etc in new blog post format Make drafts of the decided MVP } Features { inline-comments { can be on any length of text q: how to make lots of comments? since need lots of users? how to ensure quality? is it possible to create automatic comments based on NLP ex. matching wikipedia claims, twitter posts and more to the content? { matching external text as comments { better referencing format via QuoteMap. can be used for references, to prove a point. others can also disprove using quotemap. } } ideas { already-commented gets an icon. if multiple comments on word(s) get one underline per comment. if more than 4 comments on word(s) only show on hover (or possibly a menu click) the remaining. } } expand-all conditional/tagged privacy { different content get tagged based on privacy { q: how to display privacy-hidden content to non-visiblie users? { (Lock icon) { on hover show “private data. request access to read. } } technically slightly difficult, maybe even in WordPress. Maybe can have a simple PHP script for it, based on different WP-user levels? } } } informing.org v1 roadmap { use case: publish first blog post in new format { article on possibilities of argument-mapping } features { expand a term } desirable features: } informing.org v2 roadmap { use case: social (get comments from readers + post own comments), proveable from references (based on wiki). ability to publish everything i ever written on tag-based-privacy. expandable text-design (lots done thus far) { missing { expand all expand tags (level / text-based) expand before+after in-1-click } inline-comments { quotemap, is a long project so for an mvp need less } tag-based-privacy design { like the whole-life-in-a-blog design I seen from a guy before… looks like Envato.io almost with blue design + left sidebar } } Australia { Gold Coast { Co-working spaces { https://www.gchub.com.au { good environment. 320 aud monthly } https://www.karmacollabhub.com.au/work/hotdesks { 275 aud monthly. } } } } Insurance { Safety Wing Medicard { ring Försäkringskassan } } } Referenced data { Example Definition Reasoning Story Comment Idea Reference Data } Text that is expandable. DecantText 7/10 { Limiting this framework to “shareholder well-being maximization where shareholders can be investors, employees and users but no fixed demand on fairness requires a few implementations and some inventions note: even a primitive, heavily-biased framework would still be better than purely-monetary shareholder value maximization such as: individual metrics of well-being ex. ranked by desirability: automatic biometrical emotional recognition ex. body/brain scan, facial expressions, heart rate manual regular 5 min inputs via ex. smart-watch with 1-10 vote manual irregular inputs, ex. once an hour/day/month whenever user feel like it manual irregular voting based on individual reasoning ex. during decision-making, the human individual “think” what outcome will maximize their well-being this is the earliest implementation, but subject to lots of biases however, extremely low technical difficulty a proposal system process for settling on what question gets to be voted on and a voting-system DAO or similar to how shareholder-companies vote today. } InfoUX comments {look through todo} { Hover TextBlock (paragraph, section, article) and see + (add) Label (Reasoning, Reference, Idea, Story, Other) / (add) Relation ((Family (+ (Add/Link) Parent, + (-.-) Child) / Related (Reasoning, Reference, Idea, Story, Other) = Conditions (IF) ! View (Family, Related, Referenced, Models, All) I/Q: Difference between Label and Related Reference is Label is for own content and Relation is label for a relation. Does this makes sense? Intuitively I say yes. I/Q: This means all text blocks will have above features. This creates huge complexity. Is this desired? Intuitively I say yes. I / Q = Insight/Question _ Quick add / Search Add + Label + Relation [Formula] Conditions View Family All * Format (Header, Bold, Italic, Font-size) Decision 7/10 sure: Quick-action. Could be simplified so that the most-common are shown, rather than the categories “Add Parent” “Add Child” “Add Relation” “View Family” “View Relations” “Add Conditions” “Bold, H1, H2, H3 + Italic” Arrow down (More options) 3-button (More options) Good to have both for more clickable, as long as the separation of those makes sense. {IF D: Quick-action} Maybe 3-button is all options, whilst the > is more “Quick actions” Multi-labels Sub-labels If so show > for each ParentLevel } podcast Game B { taking the “cross the valley” approach of managing complexity, not just complicated systems, but complex systems to truly create value and meaning rather than appear to be value-creator through becoming rich via venture capitalists to the company. indeed should find a collaborative association approach. maybe nz is the best then. venture capitalists are “slavers” and much better to create value without going in the capitalist machinery. in 50s and 60s we went for optimizing in existing verticals rather than exploring new ground societal incentives-infrastructure and thereby hyper-competition in capitalism etc. } Dumbledore is aiming at bringing e-democracy () to life (). This can solve things such as climate change policies being implemented by politicans, provide an alternative to capitalistic, polarized representative democracy (), and showcase that we dont need centralized dictatorships () to build thriving societies in 21st century. Additionally, it can help established democratic nations () fight against the rise of Orwellian technologies () such as China’s social credit system (). We’ve been in hte design-phase how next-generation Internet can look like and we came quite far. As we’ve decantly far in the design phase, we’ll start looking at how to structure the underlying data necessary. { crowdsourced { arguments context-based word-definitions comments references related content, embedded (for ease-of-access) } personal { notes ≈ todo calendar social media feeds email } } an interactive-Internet We’re building a citizen-intelligence marketplace. But on top of that, we’re building a personal-AI fueled by personal & crowd intelligence. It will be the operating system of the future, fueling your smart devices (smartphone, laptop/desktop, smart watch, home assistant, smart earphones, smart glasses). The solution are citizen-intelligence design, scoring models, and multiple data-type integration and personal-AI design. Study interpreatation { Referencable material, the actual study. Claims { Person A understand study says sugar is dangerous Person B understand study says sugar is not dangerous } Solution { Quote text to support claim Others vote { each person got different vote-strength, to avoid pure-popularity-vote. } } } TrustScore / Under Oath / Networked, contextual trust / Knowledge-based trust { how to avoid biases? e.x voting based on popularity and not based on truth? is it possible to circumvent it through agrument-maps? Voting power } Can technology [.. help human collective knowledge to] determine truth? Correspondence theory of truth is the philosophical model used by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle that stresses thoughts or statements on one hand, and things or objects on the other. { https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Correspondence } It basically assume there’s an objective reality, and there is the subjective human experience, including human beliefs and statements { Personal reflection } Possible solutions { proposition table { p -> q proposition -> if true = conclusion } propositions under oath { from scientists, to be true } [.. All proposition will have a] /h1 truth value / { [.. modified from old philosophy, stating that they are either true or false.] } between 0-100%, based on the compound propositions [.. supporting arguments] } The design will say Proposition1 is x% true based on inherited values of argument 1,2,3 Earth is flat >0% true <100% certainty. { counter-arguments are plenty, and strong pro-arguments are few, and most common ones are false {#1 Show counter arguments } { Show pro-arguments} {#1 Counter arguments: { #11 See same sunset from different heights #12 Boats disappear/appear in horizon with height-differences #13 On a flat surfance on a really clear day, we still can't see very far Statistics { #s1 , Relevance, #s2 Ease-of-understanding, #3 truth (user read all sub-arguments) #11 { #s1, 5 #s2, 1 } } Mapping { Merging { Exact same argument, phrased differently { Summarized Easy-to-understand } One-attribute variation of argument Multiple-attributes variation of argument } } } } } Hover-box { different sections { Tabs Horizontal scroll Written out, blurred with "Show more"/Arrow-down icon Ex. content { Related claims { World is round { linguistic No, meaning Yes 8/10 } World is not flat } } } } Reasoning { premise > conclusion therefore p>q { Metrics of because { 100% consensus } Arrow } } q: can users learn to rate things 1-10? will be a large learning-curve. over time, good true ratings can be created, as relative ratings showcase Premise > Conclusion reasoning { Premise { x% votes agree premise = true } therefore { x% votes agree because premise=true > conclusion=true x% strength based on related premise>conclusion { voting on similar premises>conclusions of topics suggest that this premise>conclusion should be true { ex. if earth is not flat > flat earthers are wrong { can use “if moon landing happend > moon landing deniers are wrong” (100% premise>conclusion agreement) both premises, and conclusions are tagged “conspiracy theories” } } } } conclusion } “Nothing further to be said about topic” { Voting can be done that a given participant (voter) can’t see any further argument that could be added to the discussion, and cast vote as such. New participants may yet still add related arguments, subject to peer review, but their strength & review-priority would be lowered. } Earth is not flat therefore ‘Flat Earthers’ are incorrect. { therefore { basic logics { Flat Earthers believe Earth is flat. { 98% based on voting (Stems from name (Support 100), Counter-arguments: Many are just simply deniers of round earth. (Truth 43, Relevance 59. Hard to define “many” of Flat Earthers)) } > If the earth is not flat, then Flat Earthers are wrong. { if previous premise is true, this is true. } > > Given Earth is not flat, Flat Earthers are wrong. { if previous premise is true, this is true. } } arguments { conspiracy theorists { Flat Earth-theory is marked as a conspiracy theory. { probability of truth is lower given its a conspiracy theory probability of truth become more uncertain because it’s a conspiracy theory } } related claims metrics { other conspiracy theories { if moon landing happend > moon landing deniers are wrong” { both premises, and conclusions are tagged “conspiracy theories” (95% premise>conclusion agreement) } } } } } design like thebrain normal view. main topic as parent and sub-topic leveled under eachother with possibility of see ?!3?! levels? when hover a children, it shows up in focu-mode and its children gets bigger whilst other elements on screen shrink. so wevery time using the mouse, the screen will change. maybe its too annoying? The main claim rmeain sticky-on-top (10% height) and “therefore” becomes a node to the map (90% height). Cana lso hover other words and the map will change accordingly. Doesnt have to be levels. its just that its presented in a map format, to give better strucutre. full-screen probably. A map-block has a max-height too. If hover anywhere on the block, it gets higher z-index and full height. mindmap} Format should be everything should come in { as it will be in final version, however should be easy to view different levels. this is where panes / view-section quick-filters can be handy. } code for seperate whether left/right hover-box { make a js that apply class left/right based on screen size and hover time. default is left. if right halfof screen, then apply different css to that class http://jsfiddle.net/m1L6pfwm/2/ https://coderwall.com/p/hkgamw/creating-full-width-100-container-inside-fixed-width-container } script for show “x more” when not hover in the map_view_box { if not hover element, print how many children elements there are “4 more” } summary based on argument-map { if (1: flat Earthers believe earth is flat and 2: earth is not flat) then (3: Flat Earthers are wrong). 1: stated in #Reference x” 2: argued in “Earth is not flat” 3: because it’s a conspiracy theory, and basic argument } on-hover of claim within a hover-box, show the supporting claims in the second-section. q: cs. doubtful. supporting arguments show uup below. if over a supporting argument, show up in a third, now right column sidebar? of the hover-box? or make a 4-box scheme, if go lvl 5 use level 2 again, circle 3-5 and keep 1 sticky both sections have fixed height, are scrollable. maybe 4-boxes in total in future. waht if right-half-screen, will the 3rd column open up to the left? . nah, could still do left. no worries. open the bottom one first, then top one after. maybe an arrow that connect the parent-child rleationship, inside the hover-box, between the sections, betweent he numbers, 1.1 and 1.2? jquery/js if hover class a/b/c thenshow children of it in the second scroll-box preferably it’d be 4 different boxes, that takes up childs, regardless if they are siblings. circulate too that one close if others are opened / metrics is another problem, for implementation later, for now jjst focus on “we solved metrics” insight: the platform might not be about truth, but rather a discussion platform for the intellectuals. people like yuval harari, sam harris, trump, xi jinping, and everyday people like average redditors, tweeters can get together to discuss. hopefully the discussion leads to whats truthful, based on arguments that people tend to agree on, as cases gets settled on a particular topic. we’re not far away from knowthing the truth, entire truth. at least we wont be far from having argument-based interfaces. its important this is done with the well-intent of humaninity in mind. one part of that well-intent is that its done asap. perhaps capitalism is fine then. perhaps capitalism is better than centralized totalitarianship in control of it. who knows. open-source surely is better tho. open in sidebar (50/50 icon) open in full-page (expand-icon) open in map-view (mindmap icon) Save arguments Comment Premise + Reasoning > Conclusion Reasoning has metrics Premise has metrics Interaction of “Edit” / “Comment” (or only edit?) Metrics { Premise { Truth, as percentile rank. Can be 99.9999855645% or 54% or 0.01345%. } Reasoning { ? based on premises ? relevance of an argument context-dependent truth = longer claims (lots of conditions (q: will it be too many conditions to make sense? if so, can an avg (common sense) version be shortcutted or subject to fallacies? what other solutions?) ex. flat earthers are incorrect. flat earthers are incorrect if they believe that the Earth we humans live on is flat (similar to shaped as a disc)(or deny it being close-to round/oval)) } Conclusion { truth based on Reasoning. Based on { total metris of supported reasoning { uncertainty { conflicting-claims neccessity to specify (shorter Conclusions will have higher on this, but will reduce once specified (very promising that this metric can solve lots of complexity-issues) (ex. high-level claims {everyday, ex. politics/tech/nutrition etc.} )) unknown human-knowledge {ex. quantum, space, consciousness etc.} } ?relevance of all arguments? support pro/con? } } } } metrics for single individual { truth 1-10, changeable over time as more arguments builds up. i believe this is true 10. this true 10. uncertainty here, 5. as this gets aggregated across individuals, it will reach to other rankings. it could be modified and tweaked to account for intelligence biases (human-processing differences) such as Argument-validity (if follow trustable in most cases, gets higher (however, it requires to build db of trustables (maybe can be done automatically as high-uncertain claims get answered by topic-experts, and when having the right answer (most popular?!?) (maybe the right answer over time, based on premises and sub-arguments, based on that the crowd will change opinion given new facts (can be built into the system). ))(can also be built manually, via topic-based (how granular?) liquid democracy where people vote how “intelligent” people are in different topics (ex. i vote for sam harris in meditation, neuroscience etc and andrew yang in politics etc. (however, such a human-processing trust-score would have huge and lots of biases (but is it possible to work around it by other solutions, such as high-uncertainty claims? (maybe through a market that takes into account new arguments (but gaming the market might be possible, especially if information warfare incentives (ex. rewriting history that Taiwan rightfully belongs to CCP))))))(could also be built via an organization that reserve some power to set “winning arguments” in ex. uncertain claims) (if go with system that incentivize answering-correct on high-uncertainty questions, need to be topic-dependent) (if a commitée (small or extremely large) then it can also be decided by the “participation metrics” of users, ex. how much they take into account new arguments, how well they reason with counter-arguments, (plus how well they score according to “latest-timepoint-of-aggreated-truth” (meaning a users score will variate all the time based on the new aggregation (maybe heavy dB to aggregate truth, if so could be done as cron-jobs (ex. once an hour/day/week/month etc)))))))) } writing the above in open-source, where people can comment in new {} would be so good to get feedback on lots of items. its actually like google docs, just with some extra features, like ability to sort based on tags, since each person’s comment would be tagged with @author@ and !timestamp! and conditionally, #tag# or automatically via written keywords (synced to synonym-db, possibly {automatic synonyms via NLP + semantic-understanding via NLP)). this requires not too much, just a nice software of sharing these thoughts in. a big thing for me is why i want to open-source this is because im not the guy that likes to go back and read my own writing and format it, im just not very tempted for it, i know many others love reading their journals, maybe its a bad habit, maybe its a net positive since i keep my writing non-judgemental for myself (since i know i often judge past writings). Script for hover-boxes { ordering { based on mention in-page, the time appear chronologically, sort them so the first one is left-2, the second is right-1, the third is right-2, the fourth is left-3, the fifth is right-3 and then loop there so sixth is left-4, seventh is right-4 etc. apply css to each one so they come after eachother { top 150px for each new one } } show button { after more than 2 boxes shown, also show the box for “show in mind-map, show in sidebar, show in-page”. } interact with button { apply different css { sidebar: sort based on mention, maybe also design of children nested. have buttons for expand/collapse a handle on the top with menu for for change to on-hover/fullscreen/mindmap full-screen: same as before, in 2 columns. have X button for each, and a handle on the left with menu for for change to on-hover/sidebar/mindmap mindmap: from parent, seperate each type of sub-argument. desirable: highly mouse-interactive so content changes at every mouse-hover, focusing in/out on every object based on the length away from it. when mouse stick on an object, show a hover-box of sub-arguments with easy ability of making the hover-box into the fullscreen hover-map. maybe by hovering enough boxes (3+ different) the hover-box turn into the fullscreen-map. also have a button for back/forward like web-browser. this design is epic. } } } Argument examples { 1.1.1: – A name doesn’t necessarily imply belief 1.1.2 According to Argument Conspiracy theory names the name are often directly linked to the belief } consider all arguments CAA if { 1: flat Earthers believe earth is flat (agree after reading (considered all arguments (caa): 94% , intuition (Int) 99.9%, read top-ranked-claims considered most relevant arguments (MRA) 97% )) 1.1: understandable from the name 1.1.1: A name doesn’t necessarily imply belief (fallacy (disprove entire argument)) 1.1.2 According to Argument Conspiracy theory names the name are often directly linked to the belief 1.2: stated in Wiktionary: “A person who believes or advocates the theory that the planet Earth is flat.” 1.3: stated in Wikipedia: “The flat Earth model is an archaic conception of Earth’s shape as a plane or disk.” and 2: earth is not flat } then { 3: Flat Earthers are incorrect } . hover-box logics { – hover_box_trigs hover_shown_summary summary_item1 input label trig summary_item2 summary_item3 e1 e11 e111 e12 e112 e113 e114 e2 e3 e31 e311 when hover item1, show e1 in a box. when input:check on item1, show e1 when hover e1, show e11. when input:check on e11, show e11 { pos. 1 } when hover e11, show e111. when input:check on e11, show e11 { pos 2 } when hover e3, show e31 { pos 3 } when hover e31, show e311 { pos 4 } need to be hover: or checked: siblings. so input, label need to be all sisters input1 input11 input111 input12 input2 input3 input-menu label1 label11 label111 label12 label2 label3 – span1 – span2 – span3 span11 span111 span12 span21 span31 xx end with label span-menu // input:not(:checked)~ label:hover~ span { pos1 } input:checked~ span { pos1 } input:checked~ label~ label:hover~ { pos2 } input:checked~ input:checked~ pos2 } // input(nth-of-type(1):checked~ span(nth-of-type(1) { pos1 } input(nth-of-type(1):checked~ input(nth-of-type(2):checked~ span(nth-of-type(2) { pos2 } input(nth-of-type(1):not(checked)~ input(nth-of-type(2):checked~ span(nth-of-type(2) { pos1 } input(nth-of-type(1):checked~ input(nth-of-type(2):checked~ input(nth-of-type(3):checked~ span(nth-of-type(3) { pos3 } input(nth-of-type(1):checked~ input(nth-of-type(2):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(3):checked~ span(nth-of-type(3) { pos2 } input(nth-of-type(1):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(2):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(3):checked~ span(nth-of-type(3) { pos1 } input(nth-of-type(1):checked~ input(nth-of-type(2):checked~ input(nth-of-type(3):checked~ span(nth-of-type(3)~ label:(nth-of-type(4):hover { pos4 } input(nth-of-type(1):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(2):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(3):not(:checked)~ label:(nth-of-type(1):hover { pos1 } input(nth-of-type(1):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(2):not(:checked)~ input(nth-of-type(3):not(:checked)~ label:(nth-of-type(2):hover { pos2 } amounts of inputs checked, equals the position. so if 3 inputs checked, the 3rd span should have pos2. for all hovers its +1. ex if 3 checked, and hover another, it will be pos4 the logics { if siblings { when change state on input-of-type (x), add to the same span-of-type(x), the css class of (the total amount of input checked (y) plus one (y+1)) { when input(x):checked, apply for span(x), the css classes (amount of total input:checked + 1) } amount of input checked (y), when a hover is made on a label-of-type (x), get number of the label (x), and for the span of the same number (x), do amount of inputs checked +1 (y+1) { when hover label(x-of-type), get amount of inputs checked (y) and add to span(x-of-type) the css class-name y+1 } } if parent-childs { as above, but based on whole-document-mentions. takes more processing, maybe? harder to call (nth of type) if parent-child? maybe, better sorting if not sibling. lot of logics to think of if all sibling. how to solve the on-hover-show? could be by element-class rather than entire-block hover. however, thatd require hover-actions to be beyond css. for now early-mvp, maybe sibling is easiest, fastest to implement. will work for a few different items, if i add lots of code from above. } logics as now { inputs regulate show/hide sibling css regulate which one to display in which position, incl hover q: should it be based on amount of inputs? ex. if 2 inputs } } } fix a way of implmeneting css per different section, like a code-fiddle, but in WP whats it even called? visual studio code. ah, not really waht i thought “blog” or something lol and it was the space that was the key for continuing from the suggestions in the blog, just like on wp. but wp was better with hover windows and mouse stuff frm your eyes, it was about eyemovemnet and suddenly you knew you were 1gen to early, and fixed tech was most important than slow tech, according to the bs-seller i guess american “sale couch x” but the ccp was a different story, stcuck in the middle of my intelligence, centralizing vs distributing, at scales back and forth, not only in time but in the present, soemething the video recorder i forgot ot turn on yet hasnt experienced. anyways yesterday got tons of things written. licens-free-spotify { soundcloud but good xd { shared rev for impact### { } ))) } } copied from PS: Window in-line ex. quarter-pane. Could also be pane of inline-draggable-window.so either hover-boxdraggablesidebarresponsive:2/3/4 columns. likely 2 are common.different sizes of panes alsoso important to put the right text here.i want to be able to take notes while doing photoshop. this is just one pane. panes can be hoverable, sticky ones too. sticky, hover-map with interactions on what to be sticky/what to hover is amazing.as a standalone, software / operating system / vr operating system / suddenly vrsolution is real. im so excited. hover-panes are amazing new design-paradigm. nice in Visual Studio would be some metadata, when was each line added etc? could just do a normal editor, and then from there go over to hover-maps, like adding video, photo capability – and soon it was a vr operating system, at least an eye-movement computer one. or what about some actually healthy, useful way of operating, with arms etc. stretching while watching a map. possible through audio. or possible through brain-signals. so theres not “no more developments” rather its “aimed developments” and “common problems”. adcp always, try a name. xd food time why google force you to click confirm when “open in new” if on safari. because protect brand, because technological difficulty(<) (the prev sign is a good command. could be plenty of this to enable super-blogging. its not like amazing and whatnot, but its faster. and thats the philosophy we want. we got urgent problems not getting solved. faster. faster. til we are on path towards safer. simply. definition? lets solve it. urgent ,) its clear we are talking together at all times. what brings this to collective living? does it wish for difference? or are we singing along? and all is in your mind, she said even on the web, the hover-map can go more to the left, pos1 go left when pos5 shows. amazing! this creates better experience than scrollable. maybe also on mobile, it can be via finger-drag?!? will be greaat if via finger-drag on responisve. amazing!! and drag between different elements. wont be like hover, but its instead based on drag. hover = desktop drag = desktop & responsive eye-movement = better on responsive, also desktop later, full-out mega-nice full-body moves-thoughts-vibes-presence vr-os-ar-scan-multicamera-rather-than-360vr- draw.io but amazing drag definetely works on browser, like draw.io support it just double-checked it, 30m after writing above. would be nice with the new format tho indeed, to comment out things, and keep orginial vibe, to increase truthfulness in writing. original + edited (auto-live-parser, man-post-edit, collective-post-edit) maybe not look for business ideas at this stage, rather just develop the technology to have an edge as an organization, and later decide what to do with it. can take funding like OpenAI still. however, the design is private - because the designs are the key. the question is whether to release it public or create a beyond-borders think-tank. eventually turn into new products, like web apps, irl businesses, political parties, all fueled by the web apps (knowledge sharing) etc that are all 2nd-order products of the invention of shard-blogging. best is to let the art be art - and let the business be business. the art i will release. permanently, no going back. hide traces possible, to buy time. but philsoophically, unsure of going faster is still there. thats why doing things one moment at a time. trusting my gut. leading like george bush "trust my gut". what a man, of electoral appeal. who choose electoral appeal in China? the party sets the culture? or is culture yet to be fully shaped by software? as software slowly eating the world. wish we that culture be eaten by software (which are eaten by CCP)? insight into the party. dangers are 1) dictator go cracy 2) internal power becomes mess (lots of outcomes). hover-map can happen while never leaving the webpage. crowd-intelligence can start as first product in the new design. it starts with 1 person. even if not interactive by others. other can comment based on creating their own maps. can be helped by others, as people sort content etc for others. doesnt have to be gathered. can be crowdsourced but in different full-documents (people judge by full-document, not micro-piece (but be in direction of increasing incentivizing as micro as possible, altho full-document remain a stable solution for implementation-easiness at all future techonlogical deliverables)) mean collective intelligence can be made into software altho there's no obvious interaction. the interaction is human1 create, human2-read, human2-create, human1-read. can be full maps and can be comments. but the maps itself is so intelligent, that others can use the format to communicate clearer. cross-refernce (Ex. reference somebodys claim with an opposing one, and building layers of reasoning based on other peoples reasoning. ex. i believe this guys belief of free will. and then reference why he believes as such. can be made automatically for various authority-figuers, whether alive or not. if alive, gets input as if they were 1 single human (not possible to fully own data, since each person's intepretation of authority-figures-claims are data of each single individual. thereby result-page for that authority-figure wont be 100% managed by that person, but rather collectively by other peoples interpreation of that person. with that said, bullying, shaming etc. will be a social order decision. what do you want? you prefer personalize whether or not swear-words are allowed? well thing is, if more people swear, more will be censord etc. what if an ai re-writes others claims for you? or a human-workers does this? )) oh. trump doing good on china. dangerous for reelection as he might become dictator. usa dangerous country. china more dangerous. what can we tell? without distributed information. what does blockchain workers in zug etc think about china? not much narrative being shaped of protests. its silent. what do we react with? in this time, nothing i guess. because no distributed intelligence to bring out the smartest strategies. can release all ps drafts. can release all texts. all. should i? well, before release public, can release to friends. start asap. dumbledore is on again. suddenly you had sorting a1,a2,a3,a10,b1,29 etc. but it was recorded for you. you got the prev, and guess the next. b2 is trust 27. ax 26 cz d 100 z 2500 (z = dev. time) trust score = 1-2500. you get a random number and guess higher or lower, entirely random. other people get it too, and you rate things 1-500. build up huge datasets. then waht? hahahahahah idk im not ai technologican, maybe 1-234 of us got theories tho. 234=zzz (infifinity (cuz human blog fast (not lazy) xd) ) keep it cool. double paranthesis true. rewrite under blue. verify proof. end sign human. alright its time for blogging platform to come live current domain-watching. via expand. and a table inside there. html via wp-themes and plugins. "print html in seperate box on wp editor" __recruitment (everybody invited) new stucture, idk how. lets figure out. asap. time running out. idk true answer of above. rate is -2idk. another rating. is less or above. -19.idk if above will change .1995 born year (100% true) .2idk = -2 i dont know. 100% = 99.999∞ beyond, quantum humans have to make decisions we in charge of consciousness whether its cows or birds or spiders they are right beyond us, we make their reality and we make ours had to add space 5 times repeat since so tired. Old writings frm today { So let's see how well it worked on Pages because it had to start now it was the new blog and could be positive like it wasn't this time and actually before this time happened it wasn't that positive because it never worked and it was somehow where I could find a Bible between the working technology and the networking technology because somewhere in between those two was able to correct the Bible were actually said vibe it's very funny how the Christians to put such long time Do is a lot of time to transcribe the past message why couldn't they just let me continue talking? Why was real time impact so difficult Irl gave me. Post game. Irl gaming. Postgame. We collaborate writing and transcribing. [Writings] [also podcast, videos, comments, graph-hover, dragmaps, forks, tagging? rating?, philosophy (song writing , consumer intelligence + collective intelligence? decisions? Decision-maker Informing maker. Dumbledo-er Dumbledoer.com Nah? yes, for the editor. Visit dumbledoer.com for visit more information. Visitkort [sv: business card / Idono Elegancé (esp2)]. Beyond esp2. (esperance 2) Is? Next language, of course. What do you think it is? Fork here. [edit v1] So let's see how well it worked on Pages because it had to start now it was the new blog and could be positive like it wasn't this time and actually before this time happened it wasn't that positive because it never worked and it was somehow where I could find a Bible between the working technology and the networking technology because somewhere in between those two was able to correct the Bible were actually said vibe it's very funny how the Christians to put such long time Do is a lot of time to transcribe the past message why couldn't they just let me continue talking? Why was real time impact so difficult Irl gave me. Post game. Irl gaming. Postgame. We collaborate writing and transcribing. [Writings] [also podcast, videos, comments, graph-hover, dragmaps, forks, tagging? rating?, philosophy (song writing , consumer intelligence + collective intelligence? decisions? Decision-maker Informing maker. Dumbledo-er Dumbledoer.com Nah? yes, for the editor. Visit dumbledoer.com for visit more information. Visitkort [sv: business card / Idono Elegancé (esp2)]. Beyond esp2. (esperance 2) Is? Next language, of course. What do you think it is? Fork here. Ff About Why I Am Doing This Idk Tbh Scared to tell the truth Otherwise So now that I got so much to hide I might Spill over time To reduce time To market Through You My Clue Like Dumbledore We all create ___ Mystery In being. In the moment. Xd Autocorrect everywhere. Not sure its the atmosphere. We talk about here. Good morning man. Its 14.19 In this apt. My bro just woke up. Bro tho. Not sure yo. Will you see this tho? Yes sir you will. I told you about Dumbledore. So lets go. From here. See the atmosphere. In the moment, we choose our friends. In the closest. No sense to share it. If not vegan. I guess. Anti-culture was. } { Content Published Release 1.0 { V1 deliverables { Hide/show tags? Something to get away all the irrelvant comments. Not that they are irrelvant, but they are off-topic. Would be nice to merge things together to a topic. - is much better to use dash than parents for seperating. well, depends on what. but all above is a section. parent is the top-line yes. as1 (above - section (line 1= header)) - parser, if as1, then create section. now, what about the core problem, to organize content for 1) make sense to readers + 2) make live-parser for editor for ease-of-life, ?through tagging-system > require continious editing, like >, through constant thought-flow? requires good comment systems, or post-edit. preferably all 🙂 – a3s1 (above3sections into one, line1 = header. if want to change header-line just change the 1, ex. to line 10, or add a3s”tagging”) – re-traction (antonym verb of distraction): agree? many logical fallacies here. – already mentioned elsewhere, but scrollable hover-boxes would be great. quite a bit html and work tho. im getting tired tonight. multi-children-hover-box also good. lotta work too. } Introduction to readers of Release 1.0 { } Much better viewed in JSON. Copy it to your Visual Studio preferably. HTML will soon be published otherwise. { } Purpose { clan without clan wars man. ability to share through blogging. whether its your lil circle. or the entire world. you make yourself heard. and live your best self as such. meat seems disgusting. porn is not an option. conviction is the bliss. you never forget why you started. whether she a bartender, a future you, a future other, your mission of yourself is the purpose of the blog collective impact-making CIM } Comments general { editor + reading-experience sync > require time-edit to be smooth. the 20m edit etc isnt good yet. automatically, with verisoning and tagging, then we talking true impact-living through blogging. } Im not the one to decide what happens with this. I never been. But I had the illusion until now that I could make a wise decision on whether what im doing is good or bad for humanity. from now on, the clans choose. its the people, the clans, the government, the software, the world. bold. not if z99 (far into future). quick dinner. google pasta, rice, noodles, potato healthy. versioning is important. idk solution yet. between wp verisons and hover-graphs + taggable content becomes a live-editor thats good for you, and a reading experience thats good for you. as an agent. agent definition always. weirdness (risk of misinterpration) score 1-10. if user know the expression, ex. agent, then dont show. otherwise rank it 1-10 weirdness by the others (oh, Erik, agent you solved a metrics-problem (maybe)) Original as of Wed 18.05 { Imagine an operating system of your optimal desire. You’d be happy, through the operating system. So scary. So why I run. But no more. Although fear, an indecision is a decision. oh wow, wp editor sucks. lost maybe 20m of text because of cmd+z removes everything :'( technology isn’t optimal. that’s what we’re fixing. but at what price? we are here to discuss. I invite you to argue, to improve the world, in your way. Through collaborative human-experience in the moment. Pushing beyond boundaries, through collective blogging. Impact-living. 10x:ed through social blogging. no worries about the 20m text tho, I probably got it on screenshots (wed 16:19). screenshots = regular screenshots Capturer app take every 3 min on my screen since few months back. used for { same text as above in hover-map, screenshots [comment: no icon pre-hover. or mouse-icon. idea: mouse icon + roman-numbers could be good for levels/multiple/importance] . never click cmd+z, remember, update now. 20m edit: Introduction: this is a blog post as of now. Maybe I’ll edit this text later. But WP versions already got me covered. Just needed a better plugin of making it all together. I definitely will edit because this is too messy. I can’t communicate, which is why I got broken up today. 20m edit: how to use WP versions tho? I will likely never look at them. and they are not displayed to readers. so yeah, its a start of the back-end but needs another mixer to put together the pieces. so what about reading experience for now? because authors might come live. Crowd-intelligence. Pause. What is this? _ link _ hover_box Introduction To Release 1.0 in next post. – idk if update, because no confirmation. – just looked through material. good release is video of all screenshots from past months. just got the idea now. this is me. in real time. blogging. – but I can’t impact-stream because the technology isn’t there. recorder glitches. camera on/off. moving files so dropbox dont crash internet. this MacBook Pro isn’t really professional. proParenting.com is the kind of pro-generation we talking about in the future when technology goes a lá branch, to the elite. – [release 1.0 info: expired domains, 60m or something I guess. landlord. girl stop. me. focus. true. but her and me. could (sometimes I thought never) work. but this break-up, altho I was just explaining in a weird way, show there was no resistance to volatility. Well, [release 1.0 info: expired domains, back to work. [need to figure out vibe] list of expiry domains. [1m: table] fork-instructions. show-hide edit-hours. default not shown. in editor altho, a part of it. soon, hover-boxes, video (cut in various scenes while entertainment) Back to well, maybe because I couldn’t care for her. It just showed up in various emotional exchanges. I got emotions too. Simply analytical above else. But not always. I’m also not honest. I got my secrets. like Dumbledore.com [halloween emoji scary] Obviously hide all above from public since inner-circle would know only. Now got to crate inner-circle with the trust of today. WP + Plugins + Loopia + Porkbun + ICANN + your ISP. No fork except from mine and yours. What about robots seeing it tho? Pw on now. – ok pw on. maybe emotional regulation will work with present programming, present living, impact-streaming. that’s what this is. I tried without showing. I was without being I am. I start again. – what about pw-free version? prio on that or prio on this? distractions. traction. is the name. we’re looking for. expired, domains. could be public indeed. but 1st, good for world? unanswered. good for us? nah. therefore, rating a-z99 (1-2500) would be 500. not sure if re-usable in future, but that system might work. parts of releases: software front-end designs /distractions/* (or general inspiration) goals (1m edit) good relationship. we’ll see with who. (edit-time = automatic in future versions. manual in editor between back/front-end.) /* release: copy & paste of previous notes. /* future release, podcast e1. future release: video of all screenshots to create the software of hover-maps. could be cool. part of documentary. interactive documentary, editable by facts. facts made by hover-maps. hover-maps available while watching the documentary. or saved for later to learn more. business ideas on everything hover-maps from Netflix, to google, to Facebook (obv. profile hover-maps) with Netflix described above and google made search-engine to answer-engine. a new governance engine of tech platforms in best case. in absolute best case, optimal well-being for all human individuals existing today, including (with higher preferential) on felt emotions from perception of preservation of specie & caretaking of Earth, meaningfulness and consciousness. hover-maps business case should be part of release 1.0. social media. interactive videos. more than that of course, and the true and only desirable use-case: argument-maps. I miss her tho. I text her, she text me back. her message was sweet. lets see. I judge myself for being me. too many edits in the top-part. guess it was part of the plan. traction was there. on-track. back-on-track again, to release plan, short-term release 1.0 long-term and more tags _ help with tags _ (info to-be-added (tba)) info = hoverable info _ ex. “help out with defining what tag-system we use for content, ex. !comments, #arguments, @people. But also scoring #trustworthy #fake-news. Tagging any semantic information. #good #bad. First of the UX. Later on the content. The content is 10x harder than the UX. And UX is far from done.” above is “compact”, also another version “more edits”. or “easy-read” and “more edits”. depends, on the original. if both easy-read and compact has changed – display “original” “personalized (tbd (to be developed))” + general (“easy-read” “compact”). until personalized developed, display “compact”, “easy english/understandable/easy-read” {back to release: v1: scrollable-hover-blocks v2: multi-blocks-with-children-non-scrollable?!? too much code for now, and logics dont work yet? wait for dev. to help? v2: usage-guide of non-icons, in future. short-term. for now the ones with hover got a mouse-icon. v2: fork instructions. v2: idea on wp versions. v2: business plans of various kinds released as blog posts in this new format. like the plan was xd. (past months plan) } } } Orig backup { Imagine an operating system of your optimal desire. You’d be happy, through the operating system. So scary. So why I run. But no more. Although fear, an indecision is a decision. oh wow, wp editor sucks. lost maybe 20m of text because of cmd+z removes everything :'( technology isn’t optimal. that’ what we’re fixing. but at what price? we are here to discuss. I invite you to argue, to improve the world, in your way. Through collaborative human-experience in the moment. Pushing beyond boundaries, through collective blogging. Impact-living. 10x:ed through social blogging. no worries about the 20m text tho, I probably got it on screenshots (wed 16:19). screenshots = regular screenshots Capturer app take every 3 min on my screen since few months back. used for { same text as above in hover-map, screenshots [comment: no icon pre-hover. or mouse-icon. idea: mouse icon + roman-numbers could be good for levels/multiple/importance] . never click cmd+z, remember, update now. 20m edit: Introduction: this is a blog post as of now. Maybe I’ll edit this text later. But WP versions already got me covered. Just needed a better plugin of making it all together. I definitely will edit because this is too messy. I can’t communicate, which is why I got broken up today. beyond any simple story. now is the decision, since enough progress has been made (to tell a simple story). 20m edit: how to use WP versions tho? I will likely never look at them. and they are not displayed to readers. so yeah, its a start of the back-end but needs another mixer to put together the pieces. so what about reading experience for now? because authors might come live. Informed is author. About. Crowd-intelligence. Pause. What is this? _ link _ hover_box Introduction To Release 1.0 in next post. – idk if update, because no confirmation. – just looked through material. good release is video of all screenshots from past months. just got the idea now. this is me. in real time. blogging. – but I can’t impact-stream because the technology isn’t there. recorder glitches. camera on/off. moving files so dropbox dont crash internet. this MacBook Pro isn’t really professional. proParenting.com is the kind of pro-generation we talking about in the future when technology goes a lá branch, to the elite. [release 1.0 info: expired domains, 60m or something I guess. landlord. girl stop. me. focus. true. but her and me. could (sometimes I thought never) work. but this break-up, altho I was just explaining in a weird way, show there was no resistance to volatility. Well, [release 1.0 info: expired domains, back to work. [need to figure out vibe] list of expiry domains. [1m: table] fork-instructions. show-hide edit-hours. default not shown. in editor altho, a part of it. soon, hover-boxes, video (cut in various scenes while entertainment) Back to well, maybe because I couldn’t care for her. It just showed up in various emotional exchanges. I got emotions too. Simply analytical above else. But not always. I’m also not honest. I got my secrets. like Dumbledore.com [halloween emoji scary] Obviously hide all above from public since inner-circle would know only. Now got to crate inner-circle with the trust of today. WP + Plugins + Loopia + Porkbun + ICANN + your ISP. No fork except from mine and yours. What about robots seeing it tho? Pw on now. – ok pw on. maybe emotional regulation will work with present programming, present living, impact-streaming. that’s what this is. I tried without showing. I was without being I am. I start again. – what about pw-free version? prio on that or prio on this? distractions. traction. is the name. we’re looking for. expired, domains. could be public indeed. but 1st, good for world? unanswered. good for us? nah. therefore, rating a-z99 (1-2500) would be 500. not sure if re-usable in future, but that system might work. parts of releases: software front-end designs /distractions/* (or general inspiration) goals (1m edit) good relationship. we’ll see with who. (edit-time = automatic in future versions. manual in editor between back/front-end.) /* release: copy & paste of previous notes. /* future release, podcast e1. future release: video of all screenshots to create the software of hover-maps. could be cool. part of documentary. interactive documentary, editable by facts. facts made by hover-maps. hover-maps available while watching the documentary. or saved for later to learn more. business ideas on everything hover-maps from Netflix, to google, to Facebook (obv. profile hover-maps) with Netflix described above and google made search-engine to answer-engine. a new governance engine of tech platforms in best case. in absolute best case, optimal well-being for all human individuals existing today, including (with higher preferential) on felt emotions from perception of preservation of specie & caretaking of Earth, meaningfulness and consciousness. hover-maps business case should be part of release 1.0. social media. interactive videos. more than that of course, and the true and only desirable use-case: argument-maps. I miss her tho. I text her, she text me back. her message was sweet. lets see. I judge myself for being me. too many edits in the top-part. guess it was part of the plan. traction was there. on-track. back-on-track again, to release plan, short-term release 1.0 long-term and more tags _ help with tags _ (info to-be-added (tba)) info = hoverable info _ ex. “help out with defining what tag-system we use for content, ex. !comments, #arguments, @people. But also scoring #trustworthy #fake-news. Tagging any semantic information. #good #bad. First of the UX. Later on the content. The content is 10x harder than the UX. And UX is far from done.” above is “compact”, also another version “more edits”. or “easy-read” and “more edits”. depends, on the original. if both easy-read and compact has changed – display “original” “personalized (tbd (to be developed))” + general (“easy-read” “compact”). until personalized developed, display “compact”, “easy english/understandable/easy-read” {back to release: v1: scrollable-hover-blocks v2: multi-blocks-with-children-non-scrollable?!? too much code for now, and logics dont work yet? wait for dev. to help? v2: usage-guide of non-icons, in future. short-term. for now the ones with hover got a mouse-icon. v2: fork instructions. v2: idea on wp versions. v2: business plans of various kinds released as blog posts in this new format. like the plan was xd. (past months plan) } } } {copied away from publish, probably tons of duplicate { 1 { orig. unedited Wed 18.04: Imagine an operating system of your optimal desire. You’d be happy, through the operating system. So scary. So why I run. But no more. Although fear, an indecision is a decision. oh wow, wp editor sucks. lost maybe 20m of text because of cmd+z removes everything :'( technology isn’t optimal. that’s what we’re fixing. but at what price? we are here to discuss. I invite you to argue, to improve the world, in your way. Through collaborative human-experience in the moment. Pushing beyond boundaries, through collective blogging. Impact-living. 10x:ed through social blogging. no worries about the 20m text tho, I probably got it on screenshots (wed 16:19). screenshots = regular screenshots Capturer app take every 3 min on my screen since few months back. used for { same text as above in hover-map, screenshots [comment: no icon pre-hover. or mouse-icon. idea: mouse icon + roman-numbers could be good for levels/multiple/importance] . never click cmd+z, remember, update now. 20m edit: Introduction: this is a blog post as of now. Maybe I’ll edit this text later. But WP versions already got me covered. Just needed a better plugin of making it all together. I definitely will edit because this is too messy. I can’t communicate, which is why I got broken up today. But excited, so hey, lets do the work we need to. If this is the way, then so may be it. In this grit, I will persist. beyond any simple story. now is the decision, since enough progress has been made (to tell a simple story). 20m edit: how to use WP versions tho? I will likely never look at them. and they are not displayed to readers. so yeah, its a start of the back-end but needs another mixer to put together the pieces. so what about reading experience for now? because authors might come live. oh wow, wp editor sucks. lost maybe 20m of text because of cmd+z removes everything :'( technology isn’t optimal. that’s what we’re fixing. but at what price? we are here to discuss. I invite you to argue, to improve the world, in your way. Through collaborative human-experience in the moment. Pushing beyond boundaries, through collective blogging. Impact-living. 10x:ed through social blogging. no worries about the 20m text tho, I probably got it on screenshots (wed 16:19). screenshots = regular screenshots Capturer app take every 3 min on my screen since few months back. used for { same text as above in hover-map, screenshots [comment: no icon pre-hover. or mouse-icon. idea: mouse icon + roman-numbers could be good for levels/multiple/importance]. never click cmd+z, remember, update now. 60m: got the lost-in-cmd-z-text back from screenshot: here you could expect usage guideHover any word.Icons means this.Score.Arguments. maybe a better lang than html. simply what makes most sense. -hov- introduction -ho1 about us, 2 lines then scrollable, purpose (expand-button via mouse-hover), history, team // “had a , that was removed // is automatic in best-version-parser ” ” is comment ” Crowd-intelligence. Pause. What is this? _ link _ hover_box Introduction To Release 1.0 in next post. – idk if update, because no confirmation. – just looked through material. good release is video of all screenshots from past months. just got the idea now. this is me. in real time. blogging. – but I can’t impact-stream because the technology isn’t there. recorder glitches. camera on/off. moving files so dropbox dont crash internet. this MacBook Pro isn’t really professional. proParenting.com is the kind of pro-generation we talking about in the future when technology goes a lá branch, to the elite. – [release 1.0 info: expired domains, 60m or something I guess. landlord. girl stop. me. focus. true. but her and me. could (sometimes I thought never) work. but this break-up, altho I was just explaining in a weird way, show there was no resistance to volatility. Well, [release 1.0 info: expired domains, back to work. [need to figure out vibe] list of expiry domains. [1m: table] fork-instructions. show-hide edit-hours. default not shown. in editor altho, a part of it. soon, hover-boxes, video (cut in various scenes while entertainment) Back to well, maybe because I couldn’t care for her. It just showed up in various emotional exchanges. I got emotions too. Simply analytical above else. But not always. I’m also not honest. I got my secrets. like Dumbledore.com [halloween emoji scary] Obviously hide all above from public since inner-circle would know only. Now got to crate inner-circle with the trust of today. WP + Plugins + Loopia + Porkbun + ICANN + your ISP. No fork except from mine and yours. What about robots seeing it tho? Pw on now. – ok pw on. maybe emotional regulation will work with present programming, present living, impact-streaming. that’s what this is. I tried without showing. I was without being I am. I start again. – what about pw-free version? prio on that or prio on this? distractions. traction. is the name. we’re looking for. expired, domains. could be public indeed. but 1st, good for world? unanswered. good for us? nah. therefore, rating a-z99 (1-2500) would be 500. not sure if re-usable in future, but that system might work. parts of releases: software front-end designs /distractions/* (or general inspiration) goals (1m edit) good relationship. we’ll see with who. (edit-time = automatic in future versions. manual in editor between back/front-end.) /* release: copy & paste of previous notes. /* future release, podcast e1. future release: video of all screenshots to create the software of hover-maps. could be cool. part of documentary. interactive documentary, editable by facts. facts made by hover-maps. hover-maps available while watching the documentary. or saved for later to learn more. business ideas on everything hover-maps from Netflix, to google, to Facebook (obv. profile hover-maps) with Netflix described above and google made search-engine to answer-engine. a new governance engine of tech platforms in best case. in absolute best case, optimal well-being for all human individuals existing today, including (with higher preferential) on felt emotions from perception of preservation of specie & caretaking of Earth, meaningfulness and consciousness. hover-maps business case should be part of release 1.0. social media. interactive videos. more than that of course, and the true and only desirable use-case: argument-maps. I miss her tho. I text her, she text me back. her message was sweet. lets see. I judge myself for being me. too many edits in the top-part. guess it was part of the plan. traction was there. on-track. back-on-track again, to release plan, short-term release 1.0 long-term and more tags _ help with tags _ (info to-be-added (tba)) info = hoverable info _ ex. “help out with defining what tag-system we use for content, ex. !comments, #arguments, @people. But also scoring #trustworthy #fake-news. Tagging any semantic information. #good #bad. First of the UX. Later on the content. The content is 10x harder than the UX. And UX is far from done.” above is “compact”, also another version “more edits”. or “easy-read” and “more edits”. depends, on the original. if both easy-read and compact has changed – display “original” “personalized (tbd (to be developed))” + general (“easy-read” “compact”). until personalized developed, display “compact”, “easy english/understandable/easy-read” {back to release: v1: scrollable-hover-blocks v2: multi-blocks-with-children-non-scrollable?!? too much code for now, and logics dont work yet? wait for dev. to help? v2: usage-guide of non-icons, in future. short-term. for now the ones with hover got a mouse-icon. v2: fork instructions. v2: idea on wp versions. v2: business plans of various kinds released as blog posts in this new format. like the plan was xd. (past months plan) } 2 { oh wow, wp editor sucks. lost maybe 20m of text because of cmd+z removes everything :'( technology isn’t optimal. that’s what we’re fixing. but at what price? we are here to discuss. I invite you to argue, to improve the world, in your way. Through collaborative human-experience in the moment. Pushing beyond boundaries, through collective blogging. Impact-living. 10x:ed through social blogging. no worries about the 20m text tho, I probably got it on screenshots (wed 16:19). screenshots = regular screenshots Capturer app take every 3 min on my screen since few months back. used for { same text as above in hover-map, screenshots [comment: no icon pre-hover. or mouse-icon. idea: mouse icon + roman-numbers could be good for levels/multiple/importance]. never click cmd+z, remember, update now. 60m: got the lost-in-cmd-z-text back from screenshot: here you could expect
Gradient Slider Control In Pure JavaScript – slider.jsplausibility truthfulness factfulness Sam Harris can have a public profile on argument-map but should also be able to do incognito browsing where he can look up arguments without being recorded what he searches from a company or organization. Some pseudonymous but real-identity verification system would be great. The big problems is if its abused by interest groups, some as big as billion people. It therefore require some smart validation system. Could be facial recognition AI that’s decentralized and unidentifiable but is 1-person-1-identity. Could be via real life meetup > use ex irl-offline face recognition app decentralized ai data and warning system. Rewrite Kialo arguments into our map. Rewrite is an important feature. Ex. Sam Harris / dan denote debate can be a long statement from Sam Harris. It can later be summarized by others using QuoteMap features and approval voting from various members that it matches the views of Sam. Mvp not be based on words ex semantics but rather linguistic arguments. Related args ignore for now. So not ex map each tag an argument has, altho it can be added soon. Augment map season 1 then next season new arg structure up to 9999. Each new season got new metrics, argument styles etc. import args from earlier seasons too. People can add arguments from other non-users, ex. Influencers, and use quotemap from ex. Books to support that his is what tat person beliefs. This way arguments of ex. Charles Darwin, Karl Marx, Sam Harris, Steven Pinker, Richard Dawkins, Donald Trump, Andrew Yang can be added. Longer statements can be summarized, with condition-relations for them tore equal – and when alone they are different – and should be rated as such, but given the vote is in a specific condition – (Ex. Rate 1-100 without, then asked afterward “if condition x was met, how would you rate 1-100). Debate of uncertain topics. ex. abortion, politics, ubi is what is important – yet ?challenging?. it can be shown what different people believe, and why they believe so and dig deeper into sub-arguments. their main-arguments can be provided for each person – so it becomes like a argument-blog for each person – while the aggregated view will look quite very different?1? maybe aggregated has lots of branches and no real centralization? Rather than pro and cons should be a tag-system that ex. a sub-argument is “a comment” or “to the extent it is true -> invalidates (weakens) the main claim). A middle balance, where a sub-argument can propose a better alternative instead. Ex. UBI discussion many will be about Targeted Welfare System (TWS) instead > As such preferably there shouldnt be fixed topics, but rather a whole-related argument map. Improvement of dynalist.io is that paragraphs become to bullet-points (objects) through ex ( ) and also parent relations from > <. For now, can use dynalist.io to manage specifications. Especially if can use images there. Become a power-user there before building own platform tbh. Of course it cant be used for everything, like public blogging etc since it doesnt have paragraphs - but still, if using one bullet-point per paragraph it could work. Slowly get started with it. links (like Definitions, Context etc. (also for req. spec will be various)) can be via links in dynalist. question: can dynalist have "show more" in a section? todo: google it - Can easily find ux developrs and front-end devs from vairous open source communities. Can post gofundme for a fixed price for project. Or setup a patreon for support, ask friends and family also. need just 500usd a month to be good. the arrow is the religion. synthesism > univeralism > transhumanism ; intellegentism > sentientism > humanism – using semantics of others arguments to vote on arguments for theme social argumenting { “i dont think donald trump is a good president” somebody comments. another, high-reputation high user interpret this statement as “25% on donald trump capacity to be a good president”. } reaching closer to truth could be possible by everything interconnected. ex start with factors (which all affect eachother) and then weight options (ex. presidency-candidates) based on those factors. its very complicated tho. { rate each factor, based on arguments. how can arguments interlink between these? ex. GDP is good because it produces material wealth for the nation. well-being index is good because it our religion is set for the argument-map. its the arrow of progress, and we’re at the first step of humanism, meaning we are for equality – but at the same time balance it with progress – and balance with safety. the map will be based on that ideology if you’re more into elitism the ideology would be different. well-being measure is therefore 87% important, GDP 65%, stock-market index 45% } > the mvp could just be a way for The Community to agree on the most relevant arguments for a standpoint by a person. ex who sam harris will vote for and whats the main arguments for it. could be based on followers-only (opinion-camps where your % of loyalty to the camp gives the % strength of your vote – where loyalty is agreeing on same opinions as camp-leaders, ex. Sam Harris) For Season 1, its not about truth – its simply about mapping intellectuals/famous people’s opinions “Sam Harris believe meditation is good” It at least makes life more interesting (alternative cost for More interesting?) It creates emotional understanding and acceptance Related claims Sam Harris believe meditation is great Sam Harris believe meditation should be obligatory in school Sam Harris believe meditation should be obligatory Sam Harris believe everybody should meditate Sam Harris belive increasing human consciousness is a human future worth striving for Sam Harris belive every human meditating is a human future worth striving towards – When argument maps and scoring of expressions are there, its going to centralize language. People wont be able to have different expressions of “awesome” “superb” “great” “good” but rather all those will be known to be a score 1-100 set by the argument map. – Argument maps will be good for humanity { Yes 84% No 16% } Types of arguments { fact-based { ex. past events { this is what Trustory focuses on } } intuition-based { in part abstractions made by science in part metaphysical/beyond-science, ex. importance of well-being/reduction of suffering, belief in god in part abstractions that have too many diffusing facts and relative importance, ex. psychology, politics etc } } Season 1 will have a voting system that is prone to various biases – and some arguments might be rated very badly. However, it will be in a closed community, where we dont spread the word beyond that organization – and where we develop further. As we progress, it’ll be 1-human-1-account and possibly (if makes sense) access-limits to avoid scraping (might need some randomization, not free-search to avoid large-organizations scraping (ex. all Amazon employees ordered to get an account and scrape, or all CCP users (could be solved by siging agreement with penalites if scraping also (if scraping even is a problem (to ex. keep away competitors like tech giants (if competitors are deemed Net Negative)))).)) – Factors, based on votes by agents. Nobody 100% cares about humanity. Everybody cares mainly about themselves, as individuals. Their religion as individuals (beliefs) define if they want to believe further in transhumanism / AI / sentientism / humanism. – good re-write arguments https://twitter.com/jack/status/118963436047282995 – Sum 100% slider. { Logics is easy. Since user can only change one button at a time, apply the new value for all the new items – based on percentage changed. Do calculation, ex. if move one item from 10 to 20 and other items are 40 and 50 – then take the percent-unit increase (10%) and remove corresponding from each of the others 40/90*80 = 35.55 50/90*80 = 44.444 and 20. Formula { x(new value of inactive item(s)) = x / (100-y1 (old value of active-item)) * (100-y2 (new value of active item)) maybe an easier formula available for improve performance? } } If the design-work im doing is just for recruitment, i should plan it better indeed – Could send a pm to Venryx that Im happy to collaborate between us 2, but im not sure that Dumbledore.com will be open-source. It wont be for the purpose of me making money – in best case it’ll be non-profit but not sure it can scale as fast as that – however I’ll never have salary over $5k a month. – Time to get blogging. Markdown > HTML { Q: Start with Dynalist? It has tags, like Q. However, it doesnt have synonyms. } anyways what would purpose be of blogging? well to get feedback .instead of recuriting, itd be to get feedback frm readers. and readers would basically be collaborators. that would requirea comment system then – and quoting. not sure dynalist can do that. To do via Dynalist or develop own software isnt possible via Dynalist { privacy-tags-based-sharing { to develop self > req: to develop need login-based html-generation, via PHP likely } Differnet panes based on hover { to develop self > req: not sure of design yet. could be ex. this document, as different tags would require various search-functionality, likely via PHP } Expand based on tags { for default-mode reading. sometimes, show just 1 children. sometimes show a children but not parent(s) this is useful when the structure is leveled, but the deffault-reading should just be showing the text tagged #default } } develop own software { pro: develop lot of great features for a future mvp usable by others method: write a req. spec and find a php/js/css developer that want to do it, for good of world, closed source tho because of possible misusage of argument maps. or… just open-source it since tech giants can easily copy anyways? decision (if open-source easier to recruit and higher strength for develop own software) todo: make decision-tree for this software in an argumentMap with rating 1-100 on relevance, strength combination: hover-maps has mindmap within, and when open one, a new bullet-list-pane opens in right sidebar } – 1.1.1: Increase amount of time and energy spent to worship a deity and organize human societies with the goal to be in optimal state of performing the worshipping activity – hover any word and show a search bar and go of that word. just click dynalist you can search for any word and get results, but you have to actively search it – instead make lika Thesaurus editor that when you hover any word the search box appear, and maybe other things too like #sticky-tags and word-definition/ word-synonyms – idea: a synonym-database that has ratings, and relationships between words. ex. context-specific when to use what. includes urban dictionary too. 1 human 1 account in the rating system. alos builds the best english database of semantic understanding – throught crowdsourcing. can pay tokens to users and those tokens might have value given that market believe in the future of the tokens utility. – decision: permanent data-storage? ex. bans? considering data lives forever technically – and others can make copies and store for long time. still, right to be forgotten is good for individuals. but is it making cheating possible? maybe serve a sentence, then its forgotten. sentence has to be strong enough then. otherwise it remains as a warning. maybe after a certain time just keep the warning, and remove the details. use case: if you cheat Dumbledore you will be stored forever as a cheater on your real identity and will have less priority on acccess to various serices etc. – There’s been some early-stage actual implementations of next-level-text, especially Dynalist that has “expandable leveled text” and “global in-document search-results”. However, there are things missing – like “contextual search results” and hover-functionality, and mind-map view. Beyond that, the features should be for all types of content on the Internet, not just personal word-processing as it is now. It should include Wiki, Search Engine (Knowledge engine), Videos, Blogs, Social media. Thats the road we are on. And we need to ensure its not Chinese. Because then we have no free speech. – Argument map definition { broad definition { } definition in this context { context { whether or not will be net positive (definition) } the software of argument-mapping (broad definition) with features beyond currently existing argument-map software } top definition (62% truth) { evidence for and against a statement Overview of a topic and its supporting and related arguments to determine truthfulness in arguments Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map } alternative definitions { 61% 53% 23% } context-based definitions } Matrix end-quote is good. Everything is confifdence. Nation states, technology Synthesism vs net positivsm. What good can come out of truth? Way beyond current paradigms? Nations are old. So be books. So be opinions. So be judgement of me, and others. Truth be told. Biology, science, presence, risks and technology, predictions and dystopia, humanism and and decisions. Maths. Beliefs. What is beyond? When argument maps are true. We will make it true. And we believe you follow our value of net-positive. To ensure that, we’ll enforce net-positivism. Real identity always. Source code conditionally open, as long as you sign contract based in your nation-state on economic terms, big liability if breach. Too easy. Breachable-open-source. But will it be enough? likely not. Thats why we got to start. Becaues why wait? 2 years its been since I started this. And now Im still in the design. I need your bliss. My love. Im looking for you. And this work I cant undo. I need to get it out, before I can find, whats deep inside, me. You. Us. Collective. Community. Global. Humanity. Transcendent. Information. Prediction. Consciousness. Net positivsm. – e1 What is Dumbledore? .results_section .result:hover { width: 90% !important; transition: ease-in 1.5s; } .results_section .result:not(:hover) { width: inital !important; transition: ease-in 1.5s; transition-delay: 3s; } 2 scroll-boxes. first one has content. user can select to include more levels in it. second row is scrollable. arrows between first and second with definitions of the items on the below one. what about even further? split 2nd scrollbox levels whenever hover, scroll to a certain point in the below box. – What if the best UX people in the world worked on solving problems: Leveled text Relation-on-relation maps (endless concept maps) Phrasing-variations (ex. claims (mapping difference between “closely-duplicates” ex. (good/great, believes/argues) and inverts (do/dont))) Thats my mission. To bring the best UX people to work on this. Once we have the UX, we need to ensure we do net positive, and if we can do that – its likely hugely net positive. The net negatives to be worry about is mass-organized truth-corruption (through ex. voting based on anonymous capitalism (rich interest groups) or transparency (easy to track briberies) or 1-person-1-vote (tyranny of majority, human biases)), misusage of argument maps to spread false claims, dangerous truths being made public (ex. how to make mass-destruction weaponry), it fueling dangerous and/or uncertain technological advancements, ex. AGI or that the technology is used to increase centralization of ex. Chinese Communist Party or tech giants. We’d rather achieve amazing UX, verified-but-anonymous-voting (only the person + “algorithm” knows the person’s vote (technically achievable? through ex. DLT/encryption?), contextual-trust-score (Ex. I trust Sam Harris on meditation, Matthew Pirkowski on systems science)) where truth is based on improving long-term safety of human (or sentient species) well-being and technological development. – todo: net positive technologies should be its own hover-word todo: design of the scroll-box with hover shown in another box. and how several hovers (opened boxes) show various boxes. – One early product could be awikipedia browser, that opens every Wikipedia page or Definition in a new tab or just on hover. ElasticSearch could store the items, or be based on some other smart database-requesting. Business model could be pay-to-browse, donation, ads (preferably not), or fund-raising for newer, bigger project. Expenses are hosting and development. V2 of the product could have crowd-sourced “short definitions” of words. Maybe Oxford dictionary “ex. Apple lookup” is better then? Or, a blogging-platform, which also has nice features like all-wikipedia-integrated, and dictionary integrated. Oxford dictionary is £2 per 1k hits. Could ask users to pay for dictionary services after 10+ usage, and also force real-identity for 3+ usage.)) – To some extent Dumbledore is a global political initiative, ggiving citizen’ from China to Brazil to Sweden the right to express themselves. And to be validated on the arguments they made. It bringing scientific discourse to the masses. – Todo: Comments on ratings. Include leave-comment in the rating section. Todo: Displaying comments – Blog reasoning { Beta: Reasoning + Scoring Arriving at truth through voting-schemes. It will be a forever on-going process of iterations to reach a scoring-model that better approximates truth. But 100% truth won’t ever be found. Because of constant change. This is aimed at implementable truths, like dangers of centralization, dangers of false claims and dangers of corruption. For now, the scoring model builds on Belief + Certainty + Factors-scoring + ?sub-arguments? Can it lead to a roll-up score? Factors to determine “Which name of the product is the best?” Name { fits purpose (synonym: fits problem being solved ; fits vision) (weight 20%) fits product-features (weight 40%) easy to (remember, pronounce, share) (weight: 40%. min score 50%.) minimum score = to even be considered } } Best title { Factors { Fit purpose 1/3 { Finding truth } Name-qualities 1/3 { Easy to remember Easy to pronounce Easy to tell friends Sub-factor: non-controversial Related: remember & pronounce Sounds catchy Sub-factor: not too long } Fit product 1/3 { Personal blogging Use case: letting out thoughts but also emotions (thoughts are more reasoning than emotions, but emotions should also be part, so not only reasoning) Feature: Comment on Personal blogging for logical fallacies & invalid arguments Topic-based one-author blogging Ex. use case: somebody writing “how to” or “reflection on event” or “systems interpretation” Feature: Comment on the article. If invalid claims, change the latest-version of article with agreement from community and without veto from author Multiple-authors creating topic-text Description: A reasoning-based blog post (like a page in Wikipedia) based on arguments & discussion. The blog post’s latest version reflects the current state of debate. } } } Numbers for Factors doesnt always work. Its more complex. Ex. a fantastic name might have nothing to do with Purpose or Product-fit, but its just catchy, like Twitter/Tweet. Maybe a point system instead, where each one gets points? Maybe reverse points, the one with least “bad qualities” gets best? Nah, rather positive (To avoid fallacies). Ex. 1-100% on each factor and the one with most % on each factor wins. However, thats just what this does. If put all on 1/1/1 / 3 then all factors are equal. Blog reasoning { On {Factor: finding truth} I find its strength 3x than 2nd, and all 2nd are same -> 3x + 3x = 100 = 50% + 16.7% * 3 The word “Reasoning” has good Tag (New,Factor: Rating,good) That it starts with Blog is good Tag (New,Factor: Rating,good) Preferably tho, it’d be a one-word, like ReasonPost, Inquiry, Discourse. Tag (Related comment ; Main-arg suggestions) } I think Blog reasoning is best. Ask user in UX, why? Suggestions draggable, or add other reason { General factors for good name { Catchy Fit product-features Fit problem thats solved Fit vision } } Discourse is good, but its very similar Discord (gaming chat app), Discussion (general synonym word). Arg: Negative: – View: Arguments / Narrative / Draft – todo check dynalist mindmap / 1st line view – Rather than Product name, a good beta of decisions is on the Ex. Section/Page Title What should the title be? { Criteria { Type of title for this entire article { Summary: 85% (currently) { Criteria for a summary title: Summarizes the content that follows 55% Catchy (25%) Easy-to-understand (20%) } Introduction (9%) Catchy (6%) } } Options { Argument mapping will be net positive Mapping arguments will be good for humanity Argument-maps brings positive direction in Universe } Content { Argument mapping may { decrease risks through { fighting fake news, debunking false political claims (domestic (Ex. from Trump & Bolsanaro), international (ex. from China)) and bringing strategy (political organization, policy suggestions, geopolitical strategy, personal assistant for global population) towards Net Positivism (humanity & forces in Universe) } could certainly be Net Positive. increase risks of { nuclear warfare (from sensitive information being shared and/or increased geo-political pressure), non-state-actor terrorism (through increased organization-capability & information sharing), artifical general intelligence (through structuring (rating) common human knowledge), human technlogical domestication (through further use of digital technologies). Weighting these risks is difficult. For now, we proceed with caution of it beings misused, whilst blixtscaling (Definition: growing influence as an organization, super fast) the positive sides of the software. Doing this, we believe that Argument Mapping is a net positive direction, meaning more good than bad forces being formed in Universe. } } } } Options { Earth is round. Earth is not flat. Earth is oval. Earth is an oblate spheroid. Earth is spherical. Earth is circular } Criteria { Belief quantity (amount of people believing) x% Belief prioritized to scientific community x% } Supporting arguments Relevance of arguments { Reasoning Story-line Examples } Claim: flat Earthers believe earth is flat { Belief-based scoring { User scores { Amount: 34 votes Belief: 99% Certainty: 92% User Evidence score / User Fact-checking Score / User Fact-factor: 84% Please see top supporting arguments and see & rate their respective impact } Beta: Reasoning-based scoring { Argument Criteria { Relevance Impact Truth Belief quantity (amount of people believing) x% Belief prioritized to scientific community x% } Arguments { 1.1: (That) (flat Earthers believe Earth is flat) (is) understandable from the name { Single-argument scoring { Impact: 84% Amount: 21 votes } you can tell from the name { Synonym: 100% to “understandable from the name” } Reasoning-based scoring { yes, according to Argument “names based on belief”, where 94% of popular names have popularity/scientific agreement that name is related to belief { Relevance: 84% (Yes 34%) } no, you cant understanding something by just looking at the name { Relevance: 16% (No 16%) } } } 1.2: stated in Wiktionary: “A person who believes or advocates the theory that the planet Earth is flat.” 1.3: stated in Wikipedia: “The flat Earth model is an archaic conception of Earth’s shape as a plane or disk.” } } } Format for reasoning-support for any arg { 3 different voting. One based on pure statements. One based on mening-based. One based on language. 1-100 vote for each argument “How much does it need to be defined?” Maybe 2 votes, first understandability, and then abstraction Has several different meanings 1-100 (opposite: Can be voted by just pure statement 1-100) Is > Ex. “doing muscle exercises is healthy” has 95% on “can have different meanings” whilst “earth is round” has 3% on different meanings. thereafter users vote on the probability of truth for each Meaning-alternative. Ex. “doing gym is healthy” and “walking to train bone muscles is healthy” > “5km a day ; 50km a day”. Vote for all different ones. therafter builds up a Structured Argument based on all the interpreted meanings. ex. rating for each different interpreted meaning scored on Criteria ex. Criteria for healthy { live long heart other organs free from physical pain (definition > alt1: long-lasting physical pain) muscle-pain feel good in body mental feel good about body looks general mental health } ex. alternatives { muscle training { types { aerobics walking gym } amount { minimal average maximal } } } ex. contextual scoring { if minimal aerobics§1a< } Meaning-based (semantic) { Interpreted meaning { Alternative1 % Alternative2 % Alternative21 # Alternative3 % } } Language-based (linguistic) Claim { Premises Background Part1 Background Part2 Background Part3 Logical Reasoning1 Logical Reasoning2 Logical Reasoning3 Conclusion Context-conlusions } Ex. { Muscle training is healthy { Muscle training = defined as { Anything that trains muscles, from walking to heavy gym. Activties based on commonality of usage } } Conclusion: 79% true. If done excessively, 17% true. If healthy mean long } } Launch strategy { Post in various FB groups, ex. Game B / Future Thinkers / Digital Nomads etc. etc. for feedback of Dumbledore.com Verified identity for voting. Verify via video call initailly. Saved on database. #Specify more# Product = add claims, criteria, supporting claims with ratings of criteria Ex. criteria Necessity to specify claim 1-100 (Idea: Ux) Popularity / weighted for evidence-based user-score (ideas: / weighted for authority-figures ; weighted for topic-experts) MVP: Maybe scoring for just 1 person. Later on for social ways. For now just for the private author. Comments etc can make the author change opinion. Feature? Blogging? or just argument mapping?!? or both? what exactly are the blogging features? expandables. comments. arguments. changeable content from readers. user-rating idea for incentives of proofread & comment { as an editor, you get points for editing others content. as creator, you dont need to proofread others, but if you do get more tokens and that tokens can be spent for algorithmic visiblity so you get more proofreading on yours. mtx (microtransactions) basically. could be a business model. then if youre a creator, and never read others posts - youre normal ranking. but if your a creator, and read others but never ever correct mistakes or make good comments, you get slightly less visibility - since you dont increase the global maxima - only focus on your local maxima. } ex. claim { exercising is net beneficial = 78% { risk of misinterpration: 92% compare to: "exercising is healthy (90%)" compare to" "earth is round 3%" truth as undefined claim: 85%) } specify { Human exercise, moderate, individual well-being (Contributor: Erik Allberg + Edited by 4 people) (Necessity to specify further: 54%. Claim-Truth: 91% Certainty 85%) (Relevance to unspecified claim: 78%) (Vote to change title) { human exercise excercising, as human, doing exercise that makes you sweat, not excessively. net beneifical ((1:good for single human individual doing the exercise, ex. health. 80%) (2: good for forces in Universe, such as increase survival of humanity, and increase intelligence & consciousness 20%)) } All activities in Universe (being exercised (happening)) (Contributor: Erik Allberg + Edited by 3 people) (Necessity to specify further: 78%. Claim-Truth: 31% Certainty 15%) (Relevance to unspecified claim: 22%) (Vote to change title) { Exercise as in physics, where an activity (ex. movement of materia (ex. atoms) is performed) Net beneficial as desireable forces in Universe, set by all sentient agents. Basically, that any activity exercised in Universe is net beneficial. } } } Types of claims { absolute agreement { Earth is round } high-agreement with many contexts { charging phone til almost full then re-charge when almost dead is best } high-agreement on specified, but not on unspecified { Technology is dangerous. Definition: what technology? dangerous for who? The key is in the big apple. Definition: Key as materiral object or abstract as a solution? A good Social Safety Net is increasing growth. If GDP/capita ___ is > I believe it’s > Perhaps vote on an algorithm proposed by others. China is damaging the world. Apple is damaging } complex (time, agents, predictions) { CCP is dangerous Best approaches for each nation to combat Chinese Party is… } } Show on nex tline, the next-level text, in color from previous. start next text after if short? if children, show within children. if multiple open, do different lines technically difficulty is to start the new one on new line, even tho its on the content on the same one. google css and js how to do it create backup of designs, send to backup people. if i die, tell them to send dump to Democracy Earth Slack, Dao Telegram. Thereafter, if no response from them within 2 weeks that they will do project, then send to Wikipedia, Golden.com, Everipedia.org and publish drafts publically on informing.org. Backup contains { password to informing.org all media files of drafts all my personal notes } November review { November has passed. Quicker than other months. But of course not. I’m still on track. Defending myself in my work position going slowly – whilst the real defence is from my indulgences, which last week been fine but for the first half of the month not. It has affected others, as it has affected me. But defence mode is off, because next 2 months will be easier to get everyting going as I will be accompanied by great friends. (Comment (I learnt about myself I am very sensitive to the people around me (as the saying: you’re the average of the 5 people closest to you))).
So to review the month, on aspects of Productivity, Well-being and Personal development:
Impactful productivity Rather than launching and working toward launching, new products – I have been working on the creative part.
Comment: should I ever write as i eappear unconfident? Doubtful? Or as the saying “never show you’re weaknesses”? The creative work thats been done is primarily on argument-mapping. I been having some creative thoughts that I wanted to see implemented to designs, and many iterations and versions has led to quite some progress. There’s now slider-bars for voting on metrics. I am on the way of determining which metrics are to be used ((Clarity, Truth Unspecified, Certainty for main-claim) and ((Impact on parent or Impact on criteria of Parent) and Truth-as-standalone-claim for related arguments)). Beyond that, the hover-box should show a briefing of the argument-map just on mouseover. SHow “top pecified claim” (ex. “exercise is healthy” means generally “human workout is good for physical/mental well-being and increase life expectancy).
Also been trying out designs for hovering words within a hover-box, to see further definitions. (Ex. if hover definition of “Net positive” and there’s the concept “human well-being” one can hover it to see about “material well-being” and “psychological well-being” and hover either of those to see even more, going as deep as the user likes and there is content to be found. Those designs are getting better, although not yet fully finalized (minor problem that becomes big problem, that hover-effect should just show after having mouseover for 1 second, rather than instantly. That shoul be easily solvable, but has been difficult thus far)).
now, enjoyment. i been doing things after work every afternoon. Hiking, swimming, roller-blading, picknicks, sceneries etc. Been living in a house with an Australian family for past 3 weeks. First started out that just stay for few days, but because of the fires up north where I was going to drive with my van I just stayed “one more night” which became a joke after a few nights. Its been a blast however, and as I will leave to on Monday we’ll miss eachother. For December, i’ll travel with a Swedish friend, go to NZ then come back to the house I stayed in this month and celebrate Christmas, then haed off with the van. We’ll do hiking, and workng working from the van – throughout the month.
It’s been enjoyable certainly.
I have been meditating almost every day. NoFap has been good in the last week, but the beginning of the month was a rollercoaster. Its truly a habit I just want to get rid off. This year has been great, As i’ve been free for months at a time, but it still lurks around – and sometimes I forget all te progress I’ve made. I just dream that one day it’ll be all gone, and when reality is that its still far from it, the dissapointment grows and I fall back into the hold habit to comfort myself. My reasons for doing NoFap are sometimes forgotten. (Reasons(Long-term thinking that even tho masturbating and watching porn feels fantastic in the moment and I like doing it, i the llong run it shapes my brain and body to release good chemicals when being alone watching my computer screen, and when I get off that situation and get back to reality, to eat, socialize, work, enjoy the environment – then I have less chemicals available. It becomes a part of life thats not in sync with rest of my life. When being free from masturbating desires, I enjoy social company much more, I enjoy work and get much more done, I enjoy romance, and I build the romantic relationship I want to have later in life as starting a family – which seems like a good pathway to further well-being as an growing older))
Peersonal development These tags truly are connected, as NoFap on enjoyment as much to do with my personal development too. Meditation, NoFap, , social skills, general skills are what I want to improve. Also my work-focus.
I lrstnt various new skills this month, such as freestyling pano-playing. My cooking skills has beena bit improved too. Also has my focus-skills got better, as I’ve had quite productive workdays. Thy’re still far from what I desire, as I spend much time on things I regret later, like watching reddit/youtube/news/twitter. However, its a lot better than what it has been in the past and what it could be today.
In december I wish to get many deep-work sessions – solving tough problems like (december deliverables (structuring argument-variations (ex. different spellings/expressions, inverted arguments, same/similar meaning) scoring of supporting arguments (via ex. criteria based on main-argument, or just one single metric called impact)). As my friend arrives, I also hope to discuss some important questions regarding argument mapping with him, such as (discuss questions (openness related to impact, ex. misuage of technology by CCP (Chinese Communist Party) or tech giants (Fb;Google,Amazon) and with that, whether to be open open-source) also misalignment in product development, based on venture funding – or else setup crowdfunding donations))
Travels surely will be fun. I hope work will be the most productive month of the year too. By the end of the month I wish to feel that its even closer to bringing argument-maps to make huge positive impact. } Todo Drafts: Argument metrics based on (context: this blog article) Technical read { Technical read / Easy read / Edit Argument maps will be net positive given that It’s outcomes produce a net positive product of desirable forces in the universe which are continuously set by agents whom are categorized under such desirable forces. Consensus (single author): 58% Author agree with himself: 58% A major force is human progress, which is one of the most for the most spectacular force in the universe, whose main objectives is preservation of humanity, increased consciousness, increased intelligence, and better technology / tools. Whether or not arguments maps will be good or not for humanity depends on it’s capacity to fulfill above objectives. Without arguments maps, risks remain. The case for that argument maps can reduce risk of mass destruction Or affected by but it may create a multi-stakeholder governance framework which upheavals humanity from priston dilemma. It also brings back benefit of democracy as aggregation of free-speech becomes scientifically and economically beneficial. At the same time, it is a gray ball technology where is it can be misused for spreading propaganda, or remove gatekeeper function of secret information. These risks will likely remain regardless of the creation of arguments maps by DumbledoreBut and therefore I remember meant maps like we have that positive impact for humanity. For the forces of the universe it increase intelligence and has not posted there as well. It is also likely be useful to increase consciousness of community andHe’s likely useful tool for the increased well-being of others sentient beings. } One good way of launching is by going live on Reddit, publishing all drafts etc to Redditors and hopefully the world gets something valuable out of it. 2019-12-09 { Insights into arguments { Scoring sub-arguments { Belief () Detailed belief { Makes logical sense { if this, then that. However, even if make sense in the limited context, might not be true } How much does it (in-)validate the Main Claim, relative to other supporting arguments? Risk of being misinterpreted { Ex same meaning of words / ?too abstract? } } Used example for below metrics { Ex. Claim: Argument Maps will reduce polarity Sub-arg: Because (it) shows similarities between parties } Truth / agreement (subargument + claim) { “Argument Maps will reduce polarity because it shows similarities between parties. Agree: 85% } Idea Maybe truth is aggregated (ex. belief), and thereafter user is to answer sub-questions Certainty of truth ; uncertainty of claim ; vagueness of claim ; possibility/risk that answer is wrong Ability to be misinterpreteted as sub-argument { Ex. Sub-arg: } } Merging similar claims { Ex. { Will reduce polarization because { shows similarities between parties shows the other party that you have much in common makes people (parties, agents) see what they agree on } } } Categorizing arguments { Ex. “affect poliarization” { “related to agents” > human agents. Therefore “party(-ies)” “people” “debators” “side(s)” = agent polarization = numerical outcome (synonym: energy) (definition: in single agent’s mind (individual psychology) and in large (society-wide(psychology of masses))) affect = increase/decrease { total energy (amount + strength) being affected either direction amount of agents affected amount* (types of agent) * strength of affection affection of reducing strength of edges (synonym: affect extremism) } } } } MVP { Notes-taking { various panes make ( easily dissapear) Highly requested feature for me and other bulk-note-takers: Comments, editing, internal Linking Todo: tryout dynalist } Publish arg. map on Dumbledore.com and get email signups { Maybe Dumbledore not Wp, just pure html css and js. send some data to a server also somehow, like email signup. would be good with comments also, on the blogging dumbledore could be the first mvp of notes-taking, where i start organizing my notes. question is tho, should i organize them – or should i just read them and focus on building arg maps? comments needed on this questions, so maybe organize is good. to make decisions and stick with them. to organize my thoughts, decisions etc. and arg maps designs will be a part of the comments as they build up. however arg maps are way beyond just social comments. just like its way beyond juts product reviews like i was thinking back in the days. one use case is decision-log and collective-decisions, such as this. thats a good use-case too Questions for Dumbledore comments { Should we raise venture-capital? Tags (with metrics) { Positive / Negative -50/+50? } Good Management (toward Net Positivsism) / Mismanagement Speed of development Related: Donate to our crowdfunding How can arguments maps be used? Tags (with metrics) { Positive / Negative -50/+50? Short-term / Long-term 1-100 Likelihood of implentation 1-100 } Aggregated from these answers: “Will Arguments Maps be Net Positive? } Content for Dumbledore { Introduction to Argument Maps Briefing (use-case, technology, history, vision) About us Donate to our crowdfunding Vision of Dumbledore Edit 1d: Problems we are solving and need your help on { Mapping definitions (ex. “most fuel efficient car”) Mapping similar questions/arguments (and have relation of the difference of those (ex. “good”/”great” has 10% difference in strength of positivity), rather than strict merging) Scoring arguments Real identity } } } Comments thoughts { the metrics is just a way for the comment-author to express their belief in firm numbers rather than words. UX: instead of numbers, could be neg/pos expressions, “very strongly” Aggregated metrics from comments wont be super relevant in beginning. Could be a metric ex, how relevant is comment-sections metrics atm? } } } 2019-12-10 { Maybe scale down product to core protocol Ex. sub-claim metrics: Argument Maps will reduce polarity Because shows people what the other side believes 85% possible to be valid. 73% possible to bbe invalid. Therefore 79% uncertainty (show before tho, ex. 79% unceratinty > 85Y, 73N). } 2019-12-11 { MVP Features { Blogging better than Medium { Blogging: Disagree on point X. > Argument Map, to settle. If community settle and editor dont change, automatically change via community, or markup as Red-bg in blog, with correct phrasing in green before the other (in-paranthesis red phrasing). } Argument-map MVP features { Personal philosophy, why one belief what one beliefs. Why science is the way it is, etc. A sort-of-wikihow based on argument maps. Based on longer blog texts, so not every argument is broken up into pieces yet. Rather than bringing all solutions at once, showcase the possibility if all features was there. } } Work philosophy { Focus on doing most with the solutions gotten thus far. Leave the hard hard problems for later. { Hard problems ex. { Mapping one text-section with multiple headers. Logics, what should a text-section belong to? Defining types of questions and mapping args to them { Ex. numerical, binary, } Mapping similar answers / questions { Ex. most fuel efficient / most economical car } Mapping definitions of words { Ex. “most fuel efficient car” can mean { type of car { fuel type (electric, gas, petrol, diesel) model type (SUV, pick-up, sports car etc.) car brand (Audi, Tesla, Ford) } To map in the UX which definiton is actually being asked, and answering questions based on that is fairly difficult. } } } } Arg map scoring { Relevance (to include both on- & off-topic) { Based on { * Impact (strength of (in-)validitation), on-topic { Truth as standalone claim { Ex. “An increase of (people understanding other person’s point-of-view will make that argument maps reduce polarization) } Strength of (in-)validitation -50 to +50 or ‘0’(unsure, but validates) and ‘-‘ (off-topic) { Ex. “Because of -.- (people understanding other person’s point-of-view will make that argument maps reduce polarization) If -, instead leave score of * Likely relevant (generally. off-topic) (based on audience, if audience know this it isnt relevant, but if not it is. Ex. “what is most fuel efficient car”, a relevant arg is “electric is very economical” since fuel efficiency is often related to economical cars) } } } } } Thoughts on organization structurd { after talking with Oliver got some thoughts { raise capital but limit compensation for each contributor to 4k euro per month. problem: incentvies of getting rich for capitalists / employees. possible solve incentive by having a max-cap on capitalists aswell, kind of like loan but 10x. could look into the financing model of OpenAI (prev: todo) } } Todo: google “altruistic capitalism” { Term for “wantless.org” or similar with max-cap on salary } } 2019-11-12 { How to edit originals (time-based entries) when merging together notes from different days? By creating new documents? + Yeah, its how it has to be done, even if in future reference to an old note. Its just a new document, with a reference there. > Dynalist can do this system, by just using links – lots of storage, isnt there a better system? could be ex. one big file? Example of Simple Scoring of Args Argument Maps will be net positive 58% related > 71% validates [..] a) because will reduce polarization increase toleration { 55% validates a) * shows reasoning from opposite arguments * makes people understanding other side 21% validates b) * makes people understand why they believe what they themselves belief * makes people see flaws in their own reasoning * makes people more humble * makes people change their mind from false claims, which in 2nd order reduce polarization since less people with extremists beliefs (which are often false) 19% validates c) * brings people together through what they have in common * makes it clear what arguments people agree on 26% invalidates d) * makes people more dogmatic * makes people hold their uncertain beliefs even stronger as true * makes people deny legitimacy of logics and/or reasoning 35% invalidates e) * as differences between parties show, the real difference in belief, which are even deeper and more difficult to bridge becomes clear and dangerous * makes people less tolerant as the differences becomes clear * makes people judgemental of other sides uncertain belief } 30% related > 42% invalidates [..] a) because will increase non-logical/dogmatic thinking increase risk of mass destruction increase extremist beliefs 12% related > 78% uncertainty on anything Net positive Time-frame of net positive? Amount of agents? What if disastorous black swan far ahead due to action in argument maps? } 2019-12-13 { Rather than scoring as above with “Related” and “validates” and “certainty”, perhaps should have “Factors”. Ex “polarization”, “scientic thinking” Because this is complex, maybe should start with an even simpler MVP. Like discussion-based blogging. Feature: comment / QuoteMap { Ex. { “Because this is complex, maybe should start with an even simpler MVP. Like discussion-based blogging.” Comment on above Quote: { Invalidate 85%. I think its good to focus on longer-term solutions where its most unique. > Comment on above Quote: { Invalidates Invalidation: 47% However, in order to reach long-term impact, one must release something today – to ensure whats been done thus far is good. } } } } }
Drafts of interactive text
These are pretty huge files (Ca 30MB in total), so I recommend open the images in new window and zoom-in.
JSON file of Project specification Structured 2019-11-06
Describing all the features possible with interactive text and the roadmap to get there.JSON file of Project specification 2019-09-05
This is my most important work. Strategy of how Ted Nelson’s 1965 idea of endless interconnectivity of digital text can achieved – now 50 years after digital word processors was first invented where we got more than 1.2 billion Microsoft Office users. Here is some solutions to totally reinvent this space. I suggest you copy & paste and open this document in a code-editor.CSS code of Informing.org
Various HTML entries on Informing.org
Brainstorming and lots of features of Knowledge Management Software
Content-app requirement specificationContent Management App
“The best way to predict the future is to invent it.” – Alan Kay, computing pioneer
Decision journal
Entries
For MVP, lets use Entries like a traditional notes-app.
Sometimes Entries will be super-short (1 sentence) and sometimes super-long (whole book, 100.000 words)
Q: Entries folders
This mean user has to define which folder an Entry should go into. How about Blended thoughts?
Folders that contain Entries.
Q: Can entry be in several Folders? Yes…. desired. However cryptpad maybe only allows for 1 entry/folder
A: Entry Folders generated by content (labels within Entry (amount + diversity of Labels)
+ User don’t have to define
+ 1 entry can be in X labels
However some users (easy-users) want to have Entry folders.
Will be harder to code + bigger mistakes + harder to get users, but better long-term and more challenging and more revolutionary without Entries. Lets start with Entries.
Ideas without Entries:
Twitter-like. Each Tweet is so. However, some have Threads, and then Threads of Threads. Some organization, not just based on keywords but links or file paths is necessary.
Book-like (one endless file), is basically the same as endless paragraphs.
Time-based entries is also one approach, which are editable over time.
THINK HOW THIS WOULD WORK
However, requirement is to also be able to write a whole article (10.000 words) in this format and it look OK.
In fact, use case could be to import books (pdfs) and then use definitions (from ex. The Definitions-Section in the end of the book or 2) via Dictionary.com). And also claim validation (ex. Comments from other famous authors whether its true).
Hashtags within Entry
Editor
Paragraph relations
Show/hide levels of paragraphs
Design: plus / minus ?!? Indent?
OneNote? Does work on Mac. Show + sign for collapsed. Tag-bar to the left when double-click collapses the underlying content. Plugins like “Gem for OneNote” that can expand/collapse all paragraphs/lists
Perhaps there’s a reason that collapsible content is very rare on the web.
+ good for definitions
– takes long time to create for the author (could be solved by 3rd party adding them or requesting them + references (dictionary) to 3rd parties
Perhaps in-line collapsible content (in paragraph) is better
Or referencing external?!
But what we actually want to do is inherit across paragraphs?!?
We want summaries to become the collapsed content
Easy read ; Advanced read of same topic
Summary ; Explanation
SOLUTION: One [+] button in the end of paragraph would collapse various claims within that paragraph, through only button. It would be clear how all the collapsed stuff map into previous claims. However, maybe not – because sometimes the explanation is a story bounding together various narratives.
9: JSON?!? What will that help { ; }
Color what has already been read
Example:
Argument maps are very complex to build which is one key reason for why we don’t have them today. When they come into the world, which is soon, they will have profound effects on all human knowledge workings. This includes politicians, academia & science, investors, teachers. [+]
Argument maps are very complex to build because of UX [+], Big data [+] and Business models [+] which is one key reason among other reasons like solutions by founders (like YourTopia team, demand (Trump increased the demand for this) for why we don’t have them today although a lot of tries has been made [+ see top 10 existing argument maps]. When they come into the world, which is soon, the disappointment of current big-tech, along with advancements in NLP and increased demand along with an increased community around building these solutions, the breakthroughs are getting closer, they will have profound effects on all human knowledge workings. The way the effects come is in form of consensus on best ways, increased overview of problems, solutions, information as well as deeper interest in reasoning. This includes politicians, in that their claims will be validated how truthful & relevant they are in a seamless way for mass-scale academia & science, which will be able to map up inter-disciplinary and use reasoning on top of existing data to come up with & disprove almost all existing theories investors, as they can do much more fundamental analysis both on listed and unlisted companies, hedges and materials, teachers in the way that they’ll be able to teach what’s truthful, judge assignments based on extensive reasoning and teach in a more abstract way with the most important first and diving down into details, just like this reading . [–]
MVP: Tiddly-editor
Features
Search result of blocks (paragraphs)
Design
Paragraphs
Show blocks matching query.
ToDo, able to checkbox
Paragraph, able to edit. Link to view original Entry of paragraph.
Nice-to-have: Able to click +X to show more rows above/below. Use case?!
Filter on multiple attributes (keywords, content formats (todo, question, decision)
From Entry, all words are links to search result
Use case? Why not just perform a normal search?
What is the use case in general of search results?
Access levels
Tag an Entry or Block with access levels
Social media sharing via tags
Twitter, Insta, FB posts. MVP just prepare this via tag. Future versions use API to send.
Questions
Name on an Entry or no?
Maybe just EntryName = h1 in-text, and if new h1 then it’s a new entry
Inherited hashtags from Titles, ex. All content under h1 has tags
If search match a h1.. How to show it in search results? Maybe just bolded, or show a discrete H1 on the left, like Bear Design.
Have different Entries or all as one?
Whats the purpose of a new Entry? Maybe easier to store the content?
Hosting requirement probably hard if all in one entry.
Likely no: Freely enter a box of content anywhere like OneNote?
+ OneNote has it. Good for ex. Creative adding. Temporary notes.
– Unstructured
– Bad for articles
– Difficult to aggregate text maybe
– More difficult to create from code-standpoint and low demand, so No.
Focus only on short, random snippets or also book-long?
Book-long needs formatting + navigation-pane + paragraph-relations.
Short-snippets is like personal Twitter, also with better search.
Think: how can different colors be implemented,
Or different row lines? like coders have visual studio, but for topics with parents/children dependent on how indent
Features
Use cases
Essentially the best app for note-taking (snippets, books, journals, meetings), toDo. It can organize larger chunks of content (books, voice recordings) and later be used for project management, decision making and governance.
Random-snippet-note-takers. Project managers. Book writters. Tweet-assistant. Meeting note-takers. Habit tracking. Dream journaling. Day journaling.
Best todo-list (easy to add during creative moments + adds context to the ToDo:s + search/plan day)
Best book-commenting software
Student lecture notes (with own notes + recording & comments + sharing everything, or specific labels only)
Self-help + productivity tool
Habit tracking
Personal insights mapping
Collaborative organizational insights mapping
Editor
Markdown
H1-H6 through typing #, ## or ###### or typing /h1.
Numbered/bullet lists. Via * or 1. or 1:
Bold/italic/underline. Via cmd+b/i-/u or *bold* /italic/ _underline_
– ToDo (checkbox).Double — for completed ToDo.
@ assign in text-color
? question (background + text color?)
! decision (-.-)
Link embedding (paste URL / footnote?)
After paste a link, show a button “create a footnote”.
CMD + V = paste URL
CMD + Option + V = paste URL as footnote
CMD + Shift + V = paste without formating
Version: Charlie
Automatically format markdowns after curser-focus
Design like Typora.io where what you write in markdown becomes formatted when you make a space and start writing on a new non/new markdown object (object = ex. Words/new markdown formats (ex ###)
Automatic brackets/paranthesis. when enter ( { automatically enter ) } after cursor
Image embedding
Drag & drop inside the Editor
Drag to reshape
Version: Charlie
Paragraph relations
Parent-child
Use case: For meeting-notes. Set agenda first. The discussion around the agenda is written down as Child to each agenda-topic.
UX: Clicking Tab make the Indent go in (1/10 of screen) and that paragraph become Child. UX: Possibly to view Level 1/2/3 only (select any, minimum one selected)
Idea: Relations between items, Titles, Paragraphs?
Ex. in this article would like to have a title between this Title and the Titles “context search” and “Maps UX”?
Can be between objects, with a small Definition between these – shown as a TheBrain view – with a title, and short description – with easily view the full description in a split-view. Very useful for this type of document.
UX: TheBrain 50%. Detail-markdown view 50%. Draggable 90/10% both ways.
? Multiple paragraphs to share hashtags
- Do we need this? Maybe we can force the user to put all content in same paragraph. During search, when user wants more context –
Options: 1. We allow the user to hashtag a title, and all content below it become stored for that hashtag. 2. We allow user to create relations between paragraphs.
If 1) in search – can show “hide content from titles”. 1) easier to create tags, but a bit confusing whether to tag title or paragraph
2) just need a solution for tagging paragraphs together in a seamless way. Ex. Drag paragraphs as blocks would be a bit hard. Using markdown ex. The empty row has a – to connect them could work.
Templates
Create new Entry with pre-filled template
Use case: Habit tracking. Daily journals. Meeting-notes.
UX: Button “+” for create, and button “+X” for create with pre-filled template (inspiration: Word/Google docs create from template)
Content in journaling, both text-based and ranges/questions/checkbox
Ex. How many gram meat did you eat today? What was the key moments of today? Did you meditate 10 minutes?
Idea for later: Also possible via voice. The app reads the question and user answers via voice. If the app has low certainty in text-respond, the app ask again, or verifies the answer with the user.
Demand: 3/10
Version: Charlie
Can also leave things empty.
Ex. Habit tracking
Had an 8-scale urge to eat junk-food, after having a argue with my boss
Template
Had an X urge to eat junk-food, #after having
Labels
Sub-labels
A label can have sub-labels. However,
- Think: how to do with merging ex. Assign, todo with different labels?
- Example of labels
ToDo, assign, question, decision
Use – @ ? ! to format different content.
UX so that ?question? and !answer! !do! becomes attractive UX components, ex. color, underline, background-color & new font-color on the formatted content.
ToDo Today
Show the ToDo of today and also show:
- Above, when user scroll up (above due) (meaning the user land on an anchor of the page, that is /todo#today
- Below, show a button “show upcoming ToDo” that loads all ToDo that have dates upcoming, show them in design like Todoist
Label whole Entries
A whole entry can get labels
- Think: Do we want this?
Think: Merged labels / Sub-labels
Think: how to make strength/certainty/doubt in labels? just 1-10? or other thing than labels.. ToDo labels can be urgency/importance. MergeView should be able to easily sort or have visualization (ex. If 2 parameters, show in 4 boards -XY, XY, X-Y, -X-Y)
Label a title
All paragraphs under that title get labelled. Good for ex. Mindmap view to only see a title.
- Think: Do we want this?
Paragraph labels
Set a paragraph before, within, or after a paragraph. Can be used later to see all paragraphs with these labels.
Use case: when taking a note and have many different topics to take note on simultaneously (ex. after-meeting-notes or evening-journals).
Market-feature: Unique
Demand: Very broad use-case. Especially if can be searched afterwards for seeing all paragraphs with a specific keywords and user don’t have to hashtag everything.
Version: Alpha
Label synonyms
Accessed by the user in easy UX – with predefined synonyms. Ex. “AI = artificial intelligence, ML, machine learning” used for when searching.
S Synonyms can also be multi-lingual, automatically translated via Google Translate if user wants.
Change name on Label
Give pop-up, do you want to change Label in all Notes containing this label?
Navigation
Outliner (Table of content)
Navigation pane in sidebar. Like Zoho, Google Docs, Word Windows.
Demand: Highly requested for ex. Bear & Evernote. Great for longer entries.
Would be nice to be able to change HeaderType (h1-h6) via Outline, by ex. Pressing Tab or Tab+backward, and it becomes one level less/more, and all Children update too.
Also nice to drag & drop in Outline and the content of that header changes in the document.
Outliner hide/show also affect document
In a long document, should be able to hide, show content based on which titles you want to have open, like Zoho Navigation Bar. If hide things there, they get hidden from documents too (only document with a tab-down button in shown)
Outliner automatically generated based on markdown headings
# h1 or ### h3 etc create the Outliner.
When drag & drop in Outliner, the content re-structures
The content follows the order in the Outliner, and the user can drag & drop headings, and all content until the next heading will follow.
UX: Might require a UX that all content under a heading is a specific block.
Version 2 UX: Also a zoom-out (see 6 pages in 1, ca 20% zoom) and zoom-in again (100% on the new structure) for the user of the action being made.
Merged View with content from various Entries
Search + search result functionality
See all paragraphs with a specific keyword
Use case: see meeting notes merged from different topics, instead of going back to that specific meeting to see what was decided.
Use case: decision journal, with context who, when & why each decision was taken
Use case: can see all ToDo with relation to what concept they come from. Quip offer this in a notification-bar (5/10 ux). OneNote has this in a drop-down sidebar (2/10 ux). We can have links
Edit from merged view
Edits to paragraphs made in MergedView updates the Entry from the Source.
Context during merged view
+ button to show paragraphs before/after on a Source, within the merged view. Grabs the paragraphs before, and after. Especially useful for Merged ToDo-lists.
- NEED MORE THINKING ON MERGED VIEW, TO GIVE CONTEXT
Link to see source from merged view
Click on a result to see the Source. Link to the row-10. (ex. If entry is on row 300, link to 290). UX with a little icon (ex. Zoom-glass-icon)
Source can be opened in
- Same window
- another window
- another tab
- As a pop-up
Hide/show content within an Entry
Hide/show paragraphs with label within a document. Ex. If writing specifications, and have #stack or #risk or #estimation for each item, that content can be hidden to give a smoother view.
Perhaps labels should be headers in that case?! Its if the paragraph start with such, it becomes a label of type header… (maybe other solution because could also be comment).
Also, when brainstorming notifications like this. Everything tagged with #version-alpha can easily be shown.
Merged view not just for labels, but also keywords
Easy to see all paragraphs with a keyword in one. Not just labels/todo/assigned/questions/decisions etc, but also free-text search keyword. I suppose this feature adds quite a bit pressure on performance.
MergedView ToDo might have a table-design
|
ToDo |
Tags (Filter) |
Context |
|
[ ] Write Memo |
Meeting 2019-02-24, @Erik |
Action points we dec... > |
|
|
|
|
MergedView Todo drag & drop
ToDo’s should be support more advanced task manager features like due dates, repeat intervals, etc.
Should be able to Check if done (easy)
Think: drag & drop of ToDos.
Maybe by having a table as above, from Source, Tags etc and user can edit it.
Or the MergedView shows all Notes that have ToDos in left sidebar (like Todoist projects) and if user drag a note to a Note in the sidebar, it will go to the bottom of that Note. Could also support Outliner of the note – so in the sidebar, user can see all headings of the note – and drag it to the bottom under a heading.
Concept map
Map-view (concept/mind-map)
Essentially a new programming language for storing content, just using <>=!?#/{}()[];§&% etc
Editor + viewer desktop (50/50 or drag left,right) & responsive (50/50 or drag up/down).
Editor can be either 1) compact (no row/tab/space between objects) or 2) spacy (ex. JSON look with tab-in for each { and one object per line.
Viewer:
- parent-child view (just < > = or just { }
- mindmaps
- concept maps (parent-child with relation comment)
- concept maps (above + conditions from objects or relation)
If we have editor: should also be possible to hide/show markdown (code). When hidden, the content will be shown as normal paragraphs.
Concept maps should be also be able to use labels to make ToDo (like Mindomo), add importance/urgency on ToDos, assign people, add certainty/relevance on claims
Use case: the user can create high-level and fine-detail maps of topics, based on their knowledge – and get better clarity. make the user more certain of things. It will likely work more mathematically/systematically than the human brain.
Calculate values across objects
Use Labels across maps to calculate values to high-level items, to gain mathematical clarity and make decisions.
Version: Foxdrot
Conditions can be part of big taxonomies
Ex. Can have “network effect only apply to large-scale social media” and then “large-scale social media” has a big definition of 1) social media and 2) large-scale social media
Use case: Summary of Claim in Concept-map
Write summary of arguments and conclusion (regularly updated). Format so arguments are as Children.
Think: how to format text when one child has multiple parents?
Could be ex. Start with parent most to the left in the view
Transcribing
Constant transcribing (meetings, daily routines, sporadic note-taking)
Transcribe via constant recording (long recordings made into notes) – preferably real-time.
Use Otter API or Google/Amazon Transcribe. Important feature is to not pay for silence, so we can request only during voice input (small delay in transcribe).
Demand: big. All Otter & Trint users can be acquired + huge untouched market for all meetings being taken.
Save time easily
In phone app on home screen, or via easy GUI on website/laptop – have a button to click “important note” during a meeting/recording, to later go back and it will have a Mark in timeline.
UX Idea: Overview of a label When open a label, there is three sections.
- (If any) related labels (parent, child, sibling or suggestions)
2. (If any) row with notes with that label (in mobile, is a horizontal slider and desktop is a row with button “show more” which openes 9/16 items, then another “show more centered”) - (if any) paragraphs tagged with that label.
Search
Support to search for
Parent with all child-labels
Multiple labels across different parents
Label(s) + keyword(s) and negative keyword(s) and contain checkbox/other markdown
Search history
In search bar, show history of previous searches like YouTube music.
Saved searches
In sidebar, link to saved searches. When opened, it gives an overview of matching Entries (Notes, paragraphs etc). User can have various saved searches for the entry-types most frequently visited.
More features
Markdown (show/hide syntax)
Version: Alpha
Pin notes
Sticky to the top
Link between notes
When typing ex. !ref a drop-down search shows up with all existing Entries. User can click one and a link is created, shown as the name of that Entry. The URL path is the document-path ex (wn4kegjn-34mnri5) of that entry so if EntryName change link remain.
Alerts on notes
Ex. Alert me of this note at 2019-XX-XX 10:37. Send a notification with ring-tone at that time.
Calendar from notes
Calendar within notes for all notifications/toDos/plans or objects tagged with a date
App onboarding
Have a big button “Setup app” after first visit. ask the user how they intend to use it. Ex. “Project management” “setup all advanced extensions (speed might go down, so we recommend you remove unnecessary extensions later)
Time-tracking when starting to work on a ToDo, how long it take
Sync with time-tracking app of the whole operating system where time is spent. Offer ex. Journaling on the items where time been spent
App: custom-made responisve keyboard
With ex ! above etc. Inspiration apollo for reddit.
Version: App
French version with Numbers and Items next to it.
Bracket automatically show ending
When enter a [ also insert the ] automatically. Same with () and {} etc.
Spreadsheets with horizontal scroll + Different tabs
Can embed big spreadsheets, and allow users for tabs and scrolling horizontally to see more columns.
Focus mode like iA writer
Version: Delta
Sketchpad
Version: Delta
Password protect specific notes
Attach images
Remind user once a week (if adding snippets and not editing) to edit
If only adding new notes, remind user that “Adding new is good, but sorting will make you feel much more in charge as you clarify your thoughts further”
Design
Dark mode
On Web, offer dark-mode. On Mac, offer dark-mode via “system default”.
Labels
Labels can be auto-generated based on keywords existing in content, and added to bottom-row. First we use pre-defined list, and user can edit/add more. Any time they use a #label-keyword that keyword gets added to list.
UX: Easy to hover/click/double-click to remove/edit label
UX Idea: Note-tags are shown as separate bar in the notes-section, not in the content. Paragraph-tags are shown under/in/right the paragraph.
UX Idea: drag & drop labels to paragraphs from sidebar
UX Idea: Selecting words give up an option-bar with “label words”.
UX idea: easy to bulk-label paragraphs. Use case: when importing tons of content, ex. Tagging all paragraphs in document, or via search replace, make Labels of everything found, for list of keywords. If makes sense, also advanced search “if contain x,y,z and a,b,c and not d,e,f – tag y”
Assign different icons (or emojis) to different tags and saved searches
Like Notion.so and Bear.app
Write mode / Manage mode
When drag & drop notes, tagging them etc have one more advanced mode. When just wanting to write, have a simple mode.
In writing mode have:
1. a typewriter mode that keeps the current line where the cursor is always in the middle of the screen so your eyes are focus on the centre of the screen and don’t have to jump up and down
2. focus mode that turns down the opacity of all the paragraphs except the one you’re working on.
Questions
Entries & labels
Block
Each entry, title, paragraph, row is a block. Can tag any block.
Entry is parent to titles within it, parent to paragraphs within it, parent to rows within it?
Does that work?!?
Relations between paragraphs can be done with Blocks.
Entry = block.
Several blocks can be bound together and named to a Document
Label per title, per paragraph, per note. Merged between paragraphs?
Per title
Good for note-taking, ex. In different chapters in a book. First set the whole note with tag for a Book-name and then a title with each chapter.
Will then be easy to add several notes to the book, include quotes or general insights from the book – and all get tagged to that book seamlessly.
Answer: want entry title, row, paragraph, claim
Ex. Title#tag
row#tag
paragraph tag (also within)
Sometimes you want to have a title with a tag ex #notes-apps, and then each row you want to tag each row. Ex.
boostnote #open-source #mac #windows
standardnotes #open-source #mac
bear #started 2016# #1.2m UVPM# #freemium# #closed source#
Folders / tags
Personal / professional cluster. Possible to merge when want to, and not-merge when dont want to. Sometimes want to label professional things to be stored in the personal one. Sometimes want several professional one.
Input
Snippets, books? UX?
The note taking app essentially replaces folders and documents.
Can be short snippets or long entries (book-long).
Easy to any-time add new entries
Merge entries into one, from search. ?fits our entry-vision?
Requirements:
- Easy to add completely new (all input in one file?)
- Easy to add new to an existing topic/label (hashtag to categorize content)
- Easy to see what’s already in an existing topic/label (good navigation) (ex. By writing labels and when clicking “View” it brings up the content (all screen-sizes)
In a note, you may want to load content from another note. Such as in note with tags #note-app, #version>alpha, #feature>sync. Load all other notes that contain those labels.
The other notes with such app can come from ex another note named #note-app #ideas with a title #version>alpha and later a sub-title named #features and a ROW/PARAGRAPH? in there named #sync
Maybe embed content have a background (blue/gray) with a View-icon (angled <> like fullscreen icon) in top-right.
Entries
Family-relations
Whole paragraphs? Yes most likely.
Tab-in create child.
Remove tab create same-level
Sibling?! how
Think: have comments on notes? how to handle comments?
Perhaps comment is a sibling to a paragraph. Or could be a note with hashtag #comment, and therefore shown a bit differently (in sidebar, or different in-block design)
Output
Various outputs
Labels
Parent-relations how do with Labels for ex. MergedView?
View of entries, sorted and interfact?
How do we deal with tabs, windows, navigation?
Search
? ToDo? Checkbox. Search all contain checkbox and keyword.
Save search-links in sidebar
Keyboard shortcuts
Mac Menubar shortcut (3/4 height quick-add notes and 1/4 search notes, edit – if click this becomes 3/4 and quick-add 1/4. Maybe left-column also for browsing)
? Time for Todos, ex. 5/15/30/90. How will ToDo be formated?
Hashtag and h1, both using # – is it fine?
Look into Bear logics
Comments within Entries
Perhaps comment is a sibling to a paragraph. Or could be a note with hashtag #comment, and therefore shown a bit differently (in sidebar, or different in-block design)
The ideal product-planning app
Versions, dependencies, estimates. Features that are available open-source, and if so from what program. Comments on every feature. Should be a software that has this. Want to map up this notes-app for the features we have in mind.
It starts with features? Or it starts with user stories? Or user demands?
Users
Prefer little-coding, just typing
The app giving great interfaces to the user altho the user just do normal note-taking is very desirable.
converting content into Concept maps automatically is very desirable. ot hashtag
Mindmap users: create maps seamlessly
Lots of people have used mindmaps, and if we can learn them to use { } or < > = it will be great experience for them to quickly be able to create mindmaps, and have them connected to a whole cluster, easily read as paragraphs, or as mindmap.
Requirements
System operability
- Web (desktop & responsive)
- Mac app
- iOS app
- Android app
- Windows app
- Linux app
No bugs
No bugs, ex. On Nuclino web-app after entering a numbered-list, its very hard to get back to “normal”.
Real-time collaborative editing
Real-time edit online for multi-users, sync across devices
Demand: large, no good note-taking tool for collaboration. Ex. Bear has big requests for this.
Version: Bravo
Private access
Same encryption as Apple Notes/Bear etc, only accessible through private-key or via Apple Storage.
Plain text storage
Use case: For developers, should be able to write ex. Software Documentation in the Content-app and save it as a .txt in a folder where the code-files is stored, and the developer can continue access it from there.
Basically, we do augmentation of plain text.
Work for long documents
Should work for really long documents (500 pages) for book-writers. Database/UX only read what is being currently viewed. Works in Google Docs seamlessly.
Allow for local storage
Load .txt, .doc files etc into the notes-app, via folders (DropBox, iCloud, Documents) like iA writer. Also have internal “smart folders” of recent/commonly used.
Versioning & edit history
Show whether was edited in MergedView or in SourceView.
Allow for see old versions easily, and restore old versions. When restore old version, also keep the newer version that got deleted.
Tweaking typography to ones own preference
User can choose from 30+ different fonts.
MergedView would show “show all in standard-font (default) or “use source-font”
Demand: fairly low – so wait til later versions.
Export markdown
H1-H6 becomes #, ## or ######.
ToDo become [ ] or –
Assign become @
Parent-child become
Label become #
Bulk search & replace
Replace a phrasing in all Entries. Match caps-lock.
Later versions: search & replace with regular expression.
Remember user-settings on next visit
Remember user-settings from last opened application, on ex. Show less/more on sidebar. In essence, return to the user to the same view it had when closing the app last time.
Requirment specification
UX specifications are rated 1-10 (demand, estimate + easiness, understandability, design, flexibility, usability). The purpose is to make the sure UX contain all desired functionality.
More on concept maps
Use case: Map mental models and apply to ideas
Apply ex. network-effect, winner-takes-all, feedback-loops to ex. every-day scenarios, business plans
Claims features
- A sentence can be divided to several claims. Possible to read sentence, or see the claims.
- Whole paragraphs should also be able to be claims.
- Claims are context-dependent on several levels.
- Each claim need to be entered (or automatically) which context it can be
- Manually (have sub-contexts made of several claims for quicker adding)
- Automatically through NLP and human-feedback ML
- UX Don’t have to include every context – but rather “show more” or icons”
- UX should be able to navigate simply through claims only relevant to the context I am in (advanced by assuming what the click the user means). Ex. Going from a parent to child, should keep the context of that browsing history – rather than prioritising all parents to that child equally – instead prioritise the parent the user recently came from. Also more context-personalisation advanced.
Should be able to tag items with paragraph. Ex. Tag a paragraph with a paragraph, or at least a short sentence. This automatically creates tags for that “tag-paragraph”, perhaps even nested.
Collaborating on creation of concept maps
Concept maps
- Create content (Words + percentages + show-more)
- Create design (add images to content, background to map-view, add types of lines)
- Govern the design collectively (original designer has more to say.) Changes must make sense to the design in general (maybe based on user reputation).
Use case: multi-layer flowchart
All elements such as LucidChart. Click on object to go into zoomed-in or other map. Reference & import objects from one map into another, smaller map. Quickcreate mindmaps/flowcharts via shortcodes, ex {family > < -} {relation description “abc“} {relation type =} . Auto-create mindmap + text in-one via Narratives (auto-created from objects, or objects auto-generated from a written narrative).
Great examples of concept maps
https://www.visme.co/concept-map-maker/
Future versions
Argumentation features. What content & claims are true
Automatically generate summary to Parent from arguments from Child. UX with short titles and number-indicators of support for each side
Comparing models against other models
Ability to map out product features easily
See in a mind-map or outline-view all features (with titles) and the tags they have (version, use case, demand, estimate)
Share Entries/Paragraphs to Twitter/LinkedIn/Facebook/Insta
Easily share notes to social media. Have one UX for sharing to all platforms, that shows the native-look for all, but all posts gets edited as typing in the Notes-form, and then user can edit single post, ex. Use hashtags in Twitter/Insta but not FB/Linkedin.
Summarize books in concept-maps
Easy for people to digest a thinker’s belief system through digital medium. Easy for people to link from Twitter conversations to a persons belief. Ex. Sam Harris belief on how letting go of the notion of free will would change society, in all micro-aspects. Like a Q&A but in a map-form of different topics.
View concept/mindmap via play-buttons
Like Mondomo, play 1-16 concepts via click > > > > 16 times.
For macOS app: Spotlight integration notes indexed
Easy search notes via Spotlight. Requested feature on other apps.
Future UX of content clusters
Output: Cluster-design maybe like snowy-tree’s (circles with circles around them, and when hovering a circle, it focuses and slowly transition to bring related surrounding topics closer
Contact-book
From LinkedIn, e-mail, slack etc. Store all conversations you had with that person. Send e-mails, messages etc to the person. Like https://notion.ai/trove.com
Import the contact’s LinkedIn & Facebook profile to see shared connections. Import angel.co etc to see job roles.
Bulk-tag (especially during import)
Should be able to bulk-tag paragraphs when importing tons of content, ex. Tagging all paragraphs in document, or via advanced search “if contain x,y,z and a,b,c and not d,e,f – tag y”
Open source
Web
https://joplin.cozic.net
https://github.com/russross/blackfriday
https://github.com/standardnotes
https://github.com/rexxars/react-markdown
Mac
Https://github.com/BoostIO/Boostnote
Https://github.com/marktext/marktext
Https://github.com/Moeditor/Moeditor
Https://github.com/notable/notable
Used by Bear to build iOS App: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/creo-1-0
Memo
On-boarding
Have a demo of our Content App of all features we have in mind, the user personas we have etc etc as a whole Product Management. Also have some “private” parts in there, accessed if you verify & sign NDA.
Pricing
Free plan (trial) based on usage like Quip.com and Notion.so.
For example 1.000 blocks free usage. Thereafter premium.
Competitors
Notes
Evernote
Has 225 million users and) valuation of $1.2 billion.
Notion.so
Launched 2016. Has 6.2m monthly web users. Also 100.000+ Android downloads since August 2018. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=notion.id&hl=sv
Bear.app
Launched 2016. Has 1.2m monthly web users.
Project management
GanttPro
Features missing: MergeView. See all Gantt descriptions, images as a requirement specification document. Also, edits from the MergeView get reflected in Gantt.
Demand: easy for import. Big time-saver for large editing and brainstorming during call.
Feature missing: Poduct-management / brainstorming. Preferably Reasoning-based or using Swarm AI for how well each feature fits to different personas/use-cases and using swarm-AI for estimates.
Mindomo
Can have Gantt and mind map view. However, not customizable columns. And no Kanban. Those combined would be great for project management. Take product mangagement, brainstorming, notes, todo combine with that and KABAAM. 100 million users at $10/month.
Brand
MergeNotes
Clearly states User Value for early-adopters on forums, twitter, reddit initially. However, we will move beyond it fairly quickly.
Compose
Blocks
Don’t like the word block, its negative sound. However, its related to blockchain so people may like it.
Chain maybe instead.
Or insight/wisdom/merge.
Building our app
Building with open-source
StandardNotes
Tweaks
- MergeView:
Search tags and show all paragraphs with it
Paragraphs = toDo, assigned
?Paragraphs are shown in the normal Editor, with their paragraphs
?Link to original object.
? Have 50/50 view of original object and merge view? Look bad?
ToDos can be checked from MergeView
- Card-based UI / Google Keep. See multiple notes same time.
- UX Update a bit, look like Bear.
- Own Users-Database for premium usage (sync etc)
Notes StandardNotes
Elektron, Angular, Rails
Activation code:
aHR0cHM6Ly9leHRlbnNpb25zLnN0YW5kYXJkbm90ZXMub3JnLzEwODNjZjc1ZGU3NGVhNDhmNzJlZDA2MDBmMDY3NDkyMmNjN2QyZGZjYTVhNWRmOWE3NTI0ODUxNzhmYjcwNGIvZXJpay5hbGxiZXJnQGhvdG1haWwuY29t
Share revenue to open-source projects we use (StandardNotes ) based on
- our traffic source (SEO/SEM/referral)
- how much of our code is from open-source/own code we have
- if we have profit in the company
- a general view of how the open-source project use the money
Initially we’ll share 10-20% of our revenue to StandardNotes.
Minimal Desirable Product
- Stick with normal tag-navigation (family) – do we have a better way?
Start with open-source
Start with StandardNotes. Oopsie – doesn’t work because it needs to be tag-in-note, not tag from for-note. Bear got tag-in-note. However, we’d like to auto-generate the tag-for-note based on the content-in-note (+)? support tag- in-note taking.
Format of entries
Make one Note for each entry.
MergeView
Make an interface to see several notes simultaneously, after each other – and be able to edit them from the Mergeview
Functionality > Design in first versions
Still we should have in mind that the functionality should be able to be good-designed in future, so we don’t build functionality we think can never have good design.
Scripts
Split up entries with a doubledash to new entries
Make it easy to create several entries, by splitting up entries with double-dash to several entries.
Next version
Bigger coverage for mergeView
Either keyword search, or bulk search-replace
Keyword search
Make search for keywords possible to see merge view, not just tags.
Bulk search-replace
Of a hashtag you want to see a mergeview of, make all matches to a hashtag.
API to Otter
After managing Otter, import the notes named “done” as entries in notes-app. During managemnt in Otter, the user can add dash to separate entries, add hashtags etc.
Business decisions
Build with open-source community
+ lots of feedback
+ independent
-3 uncertanity if can find developers
-3 competitors can copy
-3 in future if want to pay salaries to great devs will be harder
-3 maybe more management of open-source devs
-3 maybe worse code if open source from various devs
+4 funnier for the devs if open source
Build with venture capital
-3 marketing
+3 capital for marketing is possible
+5 higher certainty to pay salaries to devs
Maybe hard to raise venture capital for a simple software like this? Maybe easy.
Venture capital and open-source
The “great features” can be closed-sourced, and rest open-sourced. Not sure if it makes sense although.